Tim Peters wrote:
> Since we're spread across time zones, I think 24 hours is a good
> minimum.
Ok, done.
> If something is set to 12 hours now, doesn't look like it's
> working: when I wrote my msg, it showed (as I said) about 5 hours of
> history. Right now it shows only about 3 hrs, from Sa
[Tim]
>> All the trunk buildbots started failing about 5 hours ago, in
>> test_parser. There have been enough checkins since then that the
>> boundary between passing and failing is about to scroll off forever.
[Martin]
> It's not lost, though; it's just not displayed anymore. It would be
> possi
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:16:04AM -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
> I'd whine about not checking buildbot health after a code change,
> except that it's much more tempting to point out that Thomas couldn't
> have run the test suite successfully on his own box in this case :-)
Not with -uall, yes. Witho
On 4/12/06, A.M. Kuchling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:43:43PM -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
> > BTW, someone looking for an easy task might enjoy rewriting other
> > tp_traverse slots to use Py_VISIT. We even have cases now (like
> > super_traverse) where modules define thei
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:43:43PM -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
> BTW, someone looking for an easy task might enjoy rewriting other
> tp_traverse slots to use Py_VISIT. We even have cases now (like
> super_traverse) where modules define their own workalike
> traverse-visit macros, which has become con
[Tim]
>> Phillip, when eyeballing gen_dealloc(), I didn't understand two things:
>>
>> 1. Why doesn't
>>
>> if (gen->gi_frame->f_stacktop!=NULL) {
>>
>>check first to be sure that gen->gi_frame != Py_None?
[Phillip]
> Apparently, it's because I'm an idiot, and because nobody else reali
[Tim ]
>> I'd whine about not checking buildbot health after a code change,
>> except that it's much more tempting to point out that Thomas couldn't
>> have run the test suite successfully on his own box in this case :-)
[Thomas]
> Not with -uall, yes. Without -uall it ran fine (by chance, I admit
At 03:00 AM 4/12/2006 -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
>Phillip, when eyeballing gen_dealloc(), I didn't understand two things:
>
>1. Why doesn't
>
> if (gen->gi_frame->f_stacktop!=NULL) {
>
>check first to be sure that gen->gi_frame != Py_None?
Apparently, it's because I'm an idiot, and becau
On 4/12/06, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The failures might have nothing to with the changes, though: It appears
> that some files are still left from earlier tests, and now the setUp
> code fails because /tmp/dir already exists...
That was my guess. I went in and cleaned up a
Tim Peters wrote:
> All the trunk buildbots started failing about 5 hours ago, in
> test_parser. There have been enough checkins since then that the
> boundary between passing and failing is about to scroll off forever.
It's not lost, though; it's just not displayed anymore. It would be
possible
[Neal]
>> ...
>> I'm concerned about the negative ref leak in test_contextlib. I
>> wonder if this was a result of PJE's fix for generators?
[Tim]
> I don't know, but if you do
>
> while 1:
> test_contextlib.test_main()
> gc.collect()
>
> under a debug build it eventually (> 500 iteration
[Neal Norwitz]
> ...
> I'm concerned about the negative ref leak in test_contextlib. I
> wonder if this was a result of PJE's fix for generators?
I don't know, but if you do
while 1:
test_contextlib.test_main()
gc.collect()
under a debug build it eventually (> 500 iterations) crashes wi
On 4/11/06, Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd whine about not checking buildbot health after a code change,
> except that it's much more tempting to point out that Thomas couldn't
> have run the test suite successfully on his own box in this case :-)
Tsk, tsk, Thomas. Should be fixed
All the trunk buildbots started failing about 5 hours ago, in
test_parser. There have been enough checkins since then that the
boundary between passing and failing is about to scroll off forever.
So, here's the blamelist before it vanishes:
"""
1.
Changed by: thomas.wouters
Chang
14 matches
Mail list logo
