On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
M.-A. Lemburg, 28.04.2011 22:23:
Stefan Behnel wrote:
DasIch, 28.04.2011 20:55:
the CPython
benchmarks have an extensive set of microbenchmarks in the pybench
package
Try not to care too much about pybench. There
Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
M.-A. Lemburg, 28.04.2011 22:23:
Stefan Behnel wrote:
DasIch, 28.04.2011 20:55:
the CPython
benchmarks have an extensive set of microbenchmarks in the pybench
package
Try not to care too
Mark Shannon wrote:
Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de
wrote:
M.-A. Lemburg, 28.04.2011 22:23:
Stefan Behnel wrote:
DasIch, 28.04.2011 20:55:
the CPython
benchmarks have an extensive set of microbenchmarks in the pybench
package
On 29/04/2011 11:04, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Mark Shannon wrote:
Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Stefan Behnelstefan...@behnel.de
wrote:
M.-A. Lemburg, 28.04.2011 22:23:
Stefan Behnel wrote:
DasIch, 28.04.2011 20:55:
the CPython
benchmarks have an extensive set of
Given those facts I think including pybench is a mistake. It does not
allow for a fair or meaningful comparison between implementations
which is one of the things the suite is supposed to be used for in the
future.
This easily leads to misinterpretation of the results from this
particular
DasIch wrote:
Given those facts I think including pybench is a mistake. It does not
allow for a fair or meaningful comparison between implementations
which is one of the things the suite is supposed to be used for in the
future.
This easily leads to misinterpretation of the results from
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:29:46 +0200
DasIch dasdas...@googlemail.com wrote:
Given those facts I think including pybench is a mistake. It does not
allow for a fair or meaningful comparison between implementations
which is one of the things the suite is supposed to be used for in the
future.
Hello,
As announced in my GSoC proposal I'd like to announce which benchmarks
I'll use for the benchmark suite I will work on this summer.
As of now there are two benchmark suites (that I know of) which
receive some sort of attention, those are the ones developed as part
of the PyPy project[1]
DasIch, 28.04.2011 20:55:
the CPython
benchmarks have an extensive set of microbenchmarks in the pybench
package
Try not to care too much about pybench. There is some value in it, but some
of its microbenchmarks are also tied to CPython's interpreter behaviour.
For example, the benchmarks
Stefan Behnel wrote:
DasIch, 28.04.2011 20:55:
the CPython
benchmarks have an extensive set of microbenchmarks in the pybench
package
Try not to care too much about pybench. There is some value in it, but
some of its microbenchmarks are also tied to CPython's interpreter
behaviour. For
M.-A. Lemburg, 28.04.2011 22:23:
Stefan Behnel wrote:
DasIch, 28.04.2011 20:55:
the CPython
benchmarks have an extensive set of microbenchmarks in the pybench
package
Try not to care too much about pybench. There is some value in it, but
some of its microbenchmarks are also tied to CPython's
11 matches
Mail list logo
