Re: [Python-Dev] Psyco for -OO or -O

2008-12-15 Thread Mike Klaas
On 13-Dec-08, at 5:28 AM, Michael Foord wrote: Lie Ryan wrote: I'm sure probably most of you knows about psyco[1], the optimizer. Python has an -O and -OO flag that is intended to be optimization flag, but we know that currently it doesn't do much. Why not add psyco as standard library

Re: [Python-Dev] Psyco for -OO or -O

2008-12-13 Thread Michael Foord
Lie Ryan wrote: I'm sure probably most of you knows about psyco[1], the optimizer. Python has an -O and -OO flag that is intended to be optimization flag, but we know that currently it doesn't do much. Why not add psyco as standard library and let -O or -OO invoke psyco? This really

Re: [Python-Dev] Psyco for -OO or -O

2008-12-13 Thread Lie Ryan
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 13:28:37 +, Michael Foord wrote: Lie Ryan wrote: I'm sure probably most of you knows about psyco[1], the optimizer. Python has an -O and -OO flag that is intended to be optimization flag, but we know that currently it doesn't do much. Why not add psyco as standard

Re: [Python-Dev] Psyco for -OO or -O

2008-12-13 Thread William Dode
On 13-12-2008, Michael Foord wrote: Lie Ryan wrote: I'm sure probably most of you knows about psyco[1], the optimizer. Python has an -O and -OO flag that is intended to be optimization flag, but we know that currently it doesn't do much. Why not add psyco as standard library and let -O or

[Python-Dev] Psyco for -OO or -O

2008-12-12 Thread Lie Ryan
I'm sure probably most of you knows about psyco[1], the optimizer. Python has an -O and -OO flag that is intended to be optimization flag, but we know that currently it doesn't do much. Why not add psyco as standard library and let -O or -OO invoke psyco? [1]