On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 20:06 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
There's also a list for Python-3000-related checkins. Don't subscribe
to that one yet, it's very boring and uninteresting. Also, Barry
hasn't done the svn magic yet. :-)
We're having a small problem on the svn box which requires
On 3/19/06, Christian Tismer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guido van Rossum wrote:
...
Please don't respond with answers to these questions -- each of them
is worth several threads. Instead, ponder them, and respond with a +1
or -1 on the creation of the python-3000 mailing list. We'll start
Guido van Rossum wrote:
I see increased activity related to Python 3000. This is great, but
there is some danger involved. Some of the dangers are: overloading
developers; setting unrealistic expectations for what can be
accomplished; scaring the more conservative user community; paralyzing
Please don't respond with answers to these questions -- each of them
is worth several threads. Instead, ponder them, and respond with a +1
or -1 on the creation of the python-3000 mailing list. We'll start
discussing the issues there -- or here, if the general sense is not to
split the list.
On 20/03/06, Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 on the separate mailing list (and PEP numbers).If Barry (or another mailing list admin) is feeling energetic, somebranch-specific topics on python-checkins would be nice, too. While I'minterested in tracking trunk checkins, I'm not so concerned
On 3/20/06, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't respond with answers to these questions -- each of themis worth several threads. Instead, ponder them, and respond with a +1or -1 on the creation of the python-3000 mailing list. We'll startdiscussing the issues there -- or here,
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 19:27 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
+1 on the separate mailing list (and PEP numbers).
I'm neutral on whether a new mailing list should be added, but +1 on
separate PEP numbers.
If Barry (or another mailing list admin) is feeling energetic, some
branch-specific topics on
On 3/20/06, BJörn Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-0 on separate mailing list and PEP numbers.
You seem to be the minority so far...
Because to much separation between python 2.x and python 3.x makes 3.x
seem more like vaporware that will never happen (Perl 6).
I'm actually trying to
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 13:30 -0500, Terry Reedy wrote:
Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
Barry, if you could create that mailing list, please?
And please mirror it on gmane the same way as this list is.
Subscription requests have been made.
-Barry
signature.asc
On 3/20/06, Barry Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 13:30 -0500, Terry Reedy wrote:
Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
Barry, if you could create that mailing list, please?
And please mirror it on gmane the same way as this list is.
Subscription
Guido van Rossum wrote:
respond with a +1
or -1 on the creation of the python-3000 mailing list.
+1
--
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--+
University of Canterbury, | Carpe post meridiam! |
Christchurch, New Zealand |
Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 13:30 -0500, Terry Reedy wrote:
Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
Barry, if you could create that mailing list, please?
And please mirror it on gmane the same way as this list is.
Subscription requests have been made.
-Barry
The Python 3000 mailing list has been created. From now on let's have
all discussions related to Python 3000 on that list. Please subscribe
here:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Let's start by attempting to answer the process questions: timeline;
upgrade path; library
I see increased activity related to Python 3000. This is great, but
there is some danger involved. Some of the dangers are: overloading
developers; setting unrealistic expectations for what can be
accomplished; scaring the more conservative user community; paralyzing
developers who can't decide
Guido van Rossum wrote:
...
Please don't respond with answers to these questions -- each of them
is worth several threads. Instead, ponder them, and respond with a +1
or -1 on the creation of the python-3000 mailing list. We'll start
discussing the issues there -- or here, if the general
15 matches
Mail list logo
