On 11 Mar, 2008, at 18:01, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Mike Meyer wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:55:04 +0100 Stefan Behnel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(weird places these threads come up at, but now that it's here...)
Mike Meyer wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:44:32 -0800 Ned Deily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mike Meyer wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:55:04 +0100 Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> (weird places these threads come up at, but now that it's here...)
>> Mike Meyer wrote:
>>> On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:44:32 -0800 Ned Deily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:55:04 +0100 Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (weird places these threads come up at, but now that it's here...)
> Mike Meyer wrote:
> > On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:44:32 -0800 Ned Deily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >> Mike Meyer <[EM
Mike Meyer wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:01:14 +1300 Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Mike Meyer wrote:
>>> Trying to install it from the repository is a PITA, because
>>> it uses both the easyinstall and Pyrex
>> It shouldn't depend on Pyrex as long as it's distributed
>> with the gen
(weird places these threads come up at, but now that it's here...)
Mike Meyer wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:44:32 -0800 Ned Deily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:42:49 + (UTC) Medhat Gayed
>>>
Mike Meyer wrote:
> I think lxml is the best Python XML library that meets his
> requirements, and it would make my life a lot easier if it were part
> of the standard library.
+1 (!)
--
Bob Kline
http://www.rksystems.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:01:14 +1300 Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Meyer wrote:
> > Trying to install it from the repository is a PITA, because
> > it uses both the easyinstall and Pyrex
>
> It shouldn't depend on Pyrex as long as it's distributed
> with the generated C files. If it'
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:44:32 -0800 Ned Deily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:42:49 + (UTC) Medhat Gayed
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > lxml is good but not written in python and difficult to
Mike Meyer wrote:
> Trying to install it from the repository is a PITA, because
> it uses both the easyinstall and Pyrex
It shouldn't depend on Pyrex as long as it's distributed
with the generated C files. If it's not, that's an
oversight on the part of the distributor.
--
Greg Ewing, Computer S
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:42:49 + (UTC) Medhat Gayed
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > lxml is good but not written in python and difficult to install and didn't
> > work
> > on MacOS X.
> lxml is built on top of libxml2/lib
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:42:49 + (UTC) Medhat Gayed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> lxml is good but not written in python and difficult to install and didn't
> work
> on MacOS X.
lxml is built on top of libxml2/libxslt, which are bundled with most
Unix-like OS's (including Mac OS X), or available
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008, Medhat Gayed wrote:
>
> I tested and tried a few XML validators but none of them is able to
> successfully validate a string of xml (not a file just a string) to
> programatically be able to validate messages of xml that flow in and
> out of the different systems. Teh validat
I tested and tried a few XML validators but none of them is able to successfully
validate a string of xml (not a file just a string) to programatically be able
to validate messages of xml that flow in and out of the different systems.
Teh validators I used were XSV, oNVDL and lxml, can we implement
13 matches
Mail list logo
