On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 1:37 PM Jonathan Goble wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 4:04 PM Nathan C. Fox
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, it was intended to go to python-dev, even though it's not about
>> Python development. It's part of a discussion about a pretty hostile and
>> off-topic thread that has unfold
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 4:04 PM Nathan C. Fox
wrote:
> Yes, it was intended to go to python-dev, even though it's not about
> Python development. It's part of a discussion about a pretty hostile and
> off-topic thread that has unfolded over the last week on this mailing list.
>
Brett's original
Yes, it was intended to go to python-dev, even though it's not about Python
development. It's part of a discussion about a pretty hostile and off-topic
thread that has unfolded over the last week on this mailing list.
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/thread/JRFJ4QH7TR35H
Was this post intended to go to python-dev or...?
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 9:53 AM Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/thread/JRFJ4QH7TR35HFRQWOYPPCGOYRFAXK24/
>
> I can't be objective with Marco as I believe we have recorded issues with him
> previ
I can agree with the general premise of what Antoine is saying, but to me
even as a non-participant, the following quote from the thread Brett linked
seems a clear CoC violation:
I repeat, even the worst AI will understand from the context what I meant.
> But let me do a very rude example:
>
> Wha
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 09:47:13 -0700
Brett Cannon wrote:
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/thread/JRFJ4QH7TR35HFRQWOYPPCGOYRFAXK24/
>
> I can't be objective with Marco as I believe we have recorded issues with
> him previously (as with Steven if you take Marco's initial
