Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Mark Shannon wrote:
The text of the PEP seems to implicitly assume that all sub-iterators
will be generators, so it is not clear on the above points.
On the contrary, this question is explicitly addressed in the PEP:
http://www.python.org/d
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Mark Shannon wrote:
>
> The text of the PEP seems to implicitly assume that all sub-iterators
> will be generators, so it is not clear on the above points.
On the contrary, this question is explicitly addressed in the PEP:
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0380/#
Hi,
The scenario is this:
A generator, G, has a non-generator sub-iterator, S,
(ie G includes a "yield from S" experssion and S is not a generator)
and either G.close() or G.throw(GeneratorExit) is called.
In the current implementation, S.close() is called and,
if that call raises an exception,
