-On [20080413 19:59], "Martin v. Löwis" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Making suggestions on the list, and then following up with patch,
>is certainly encouraged, and happens all the time.
Here you go.
>I just think that *this* specific proposed change is more effort to
>talk about than it's worth.
Brett Cannon schrieb:
>> +0. If we ever run out of letters for command line options to have
>> to collect -J, we have deeper problems than having to coordinate
>> with Jython whether the letter is still available.
>
> +0
Shall I remove the reservation of -J again?
Christian
> > > > Isn't that bikeshedding?
> > >
> > > No. I think "implementation-specific" is definitely more accurate,
> > > and I was hoping the suggestion might get an immediate "good idea,
> > > implemented", from somebody already looking at that code.
> >
> > It's already committed, so one
"Martin v. Löwis" writes:
> > > > How about "-X is reserved for implementation-specific arguments"?
> >
> > > Isn't that bikeshedding?
> >
> > No. I think "implementation-specific" is definitely more accurate,
> > and I was hoping the suggestion might get an immediate "good idea,
> > im
> > > How about "-X is reserved for implementation-specific arguments"?
>
> > Isn't that bikeshedding?
>
> No. I think "implementation-specific" is definitely more accurate,
> and I was hoping the suggestion might get an immediate "good idea,
> implemented", from somebody already looking at th
"Martin v. Löwis" writes:
> > How about "-X is reserved for implementation-specific arguments"?
> Isn't that bikeshedding?
No. I think "implementation-specific" is definitely more accurate,
and I was hoping the suggestion might get an immediate "good idea,
implemented", from somebody already
> How about "-X is reserved for implementation-specific arguments"? Ie,
> I suppose that the intent is not that these arguments won't be
> standardized, it's that they be standardized by the affected
> implementations.
Isn't that bikeshedding?
Regards,
Martin
Frank Wierzbicki writes:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was also going to suggest a platform independent option. I like
> > -Xwhat-follows-is-impl-dependent.
> This would work just fine for us, and it makes sense to have it
> available for al
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 1:08 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Great, thanks! While I'd love to have *both* -X and -J, is that okay
> > with the other devs?
>
> +0. If we ever run out of letters for command line options to have
> to collect -J, we have deeper problems than ha
> Great, thanks! While I'd love to have *both* -X and -J, is that okay
> with the other devs?
+0. If we ever run out of letters for command line options to have
to collect -J, we have deeper problems than having to coordinate
with Jython whether the letter is still available.
Regards,
Martin
___
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brett Cannon schrieb:
>
> >> -X is reserved for non-standard arguments
> >
> > Fine by me.
>
> And implemented in r62293 (trunk)
Great, thanks! While I'd love to have *both* -X and -J, is that okay
with the other d
Brett Cannon schrieb:
>> -X is reserved for non-standard arguments
>
> Fine by me.
And implemented in r62293 (trunk)
Christian
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://m
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 5:42 AM, Frank Wierzbicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was also going to suggest a platform independent option. I like
> > -Xwhat-follows-is-impl-dependent.
> This would work just fine for us
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was also going to suggest a platform independent option. I like
> -Xwhat-follows-is-impl-dependent.
This would work just fine for us, and it makes sense to have it
available for all implementations. If everyone likes th
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank
> Wierzbicki
> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 12:14 PM
> To: Brett Cannon
> Cc: Guido van Rossum; python-dev@python.org
> Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Reserving an arg space
Frank Wierzbicki wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Works for me. We should have a patch to CPython that looks for -J and
>>>
>> > rejects it w
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Reserving an arg space for Jython
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Works for me. We should have a patch to CPython that looks
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Works for me. We should have a patch to CPython that looks for -J and
> > rejects it with "-J is reserved for Jython".
> >
>
> Do we want
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Works for me. We should have a patch to CPython that looks for -J and
> rejects it with "-J is reserved for Jython".
>
Do we want it to be Jython-specific, or should it be available to any
alternative VM? I don't know
Patch is here: http://bugs.python.org/issue2617
-Frank
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Works for me. We should have a patch to CPython that looks for -J and
> rejects it with "-J is reserved for Jython".
Great! Knowing this crowd it is probably already implemented -- but
if not I'd love to dust off my C
Works for me. We should have a patch to CPython that looks for -J and
rejects it with "-J is reserved for Jython".
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Frank Wierzbicki
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if it might be possible for Jython to get an "arg
> space" for command li
Hi all,
I was wondering if it might be possible for Jython to get an "arg
space" for command line execution. We try to deliver the same
switches that Python delivers (so for example -c means "program passed
in as string" on Python and Jython). We have some need for arguments
that would be Jython
23 matches
Mail list logo
