On Fri Mar 7 20:54:31 CET 2014, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Jim J. Jewett jimjjewett at gmail.com wrote:
(Thu Mar 6 23:26:47 CET 2014) Chris Angelico responded:
...[as-capturing is] deferred until there's a non-closure means of
creating a sub-scope.
The problem
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Jim J. Jewett jimjjew...@gmail.com wrote:
The PEP should therefore explicitly state that implementation details
may force the deferral to be permanent, and that this is considered an
acceptable trade-off.
How about words to this effect?
Should there be, in
