Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:09:14 am Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Antoine Pitrou
> wrote:
>>> Steven D'Aprano pearwood.info> writes:
I don't understand that rationale. Let's take a concrete example.
The new `yield from` syntax was acce
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 15:59, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:54:52 am Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> > > [GvR]
> > >
> > >> I still wish we could go back in time and unify sets and dicts, if
> > >> only to find out how that experiment would turn out.
> > >
>
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:09:14 am Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Antoine Pitrou
wrote:
> > Steven D'Aprano pearwood.info> writes:
> >> I don't understand that rationale. Let's take a concrete example.
> >> The new `yield from` syntax was accepted
> >
> > Was it?
>
> No.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano pearwood.info> writes:
>>
>> I don't understand that rationale. Let's take a concrete example. The
>> new `yield from` syntax was accepted
>
> Was it?
No.
--
--Guido van Rossum
PS. My elbow needs a couple more weeks of r
Steven D'Aprano pearwood.info> writes:
>
> I don't understand that rationale. Let's take a concrete example. The
> new `yield from` syntax was accepted
Was it?
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:54:52 am Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> > [GvR]
> >
> >> I still wish we could go back in time and unify sets and dicts, if
> >> only to find out how that experiment would turn out.
> >
> > I'm curious about the outcome of another experiment along those
> >
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> [GvR]
>> I still wish we could go back in time and unify sets and dicts, if
>> only to find out how that experiment would turn out.
>
> I'm curious about the outcome of another experiment along those lines.
> Is anyone seeing uptake for the set methods on mapping views i
I'm curious about the outcome of another experiment along those lines.
Is anyone seeing uptake for the set methods on mapping views in Py3.x?
Next version of Graphine will use them heavily for graph
merges and set operations on graphs.
That's great! Thanks for the data point.
I look forwar
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> [GvR]
>>
>> I still wish we could go back in time and unify sets and dicts, if
>> only to find out how that experiment would turn out.
>
> I'm curious about the outcome of another experiment along those lines.
> Is anyone seeing uptake fo
[GvR]
I still wish we could go back in time and unify sets and dicts, if
only to find out how that experiment would turn out.
I'm curious about the outcome of another experiment along those lines.
Is anyone seeing uptake for the set methods on mapping views in Py3.x?
I haven't seen any code us
10 matches
Mail list logo
