Ned Deily wrote:
> In article <87zkmcalt8@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>,
> "Stephen J. Turnbull" wrote:
> > Are you saying you expect Mac OS X 10.4 "Tiger" to go green once the
> > bots update? If so, I'm impressed, and "thank you!" to all involved.
> > Apple and MacPorts have long since wash
On 5/24/2011 6:27 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Thank you very much! What a beautiful sight this is:
http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/all/waterfall?category=3.x.stable
(until a sporadic failure comes up, that is)
I could turn test_crashers b
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Thank you very much! What a beautiful sight this is:
> http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/all/waterfall?category=3.x.stable
>
> (until a sporadic failure comes up, that is)
I could turn test_crashers back on if you like ;)
Great work to al
On Mon, 23 May 2011 19:16:36 +0200
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>
> I have now completed the cleanup and we're back on green-land for the
> stable bots.
>
> The red slaves should get green when they catch up with the latest rev
> (they are slow). If they're not and they are failing in packaging or
> sysco
In article <87zkmcalt8@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>,
"Stephen J. Turnbull" wrote:
> Are you saying you expect Mac OS X 10.4 "Tiger" to go green once the
> bots update? If so, I'm impressed, and "thank you!" to all involved.
> Apple and MacPorts have long since washed their hands of that releas
On Tue, 24 May 2011 11:12:35 +0900, "Stephen J. Turnbull"
wrote:
> Tarek Ziadé writes:
>
> > I have now completed the cleanup and we're back on green-land for the
> > stable bots.
>
> Are you saying you expect Mac OS X 10.4 "Tiger" to go green once the
> bots update? If so, I'm impressed, a
Tarek Ziadé writes:
> I have now completed the cleanup and we're back on green-land for the
> stable bots.
Are you saying you expect Mac OS X 10.4 "Tiger" to go green once the
bots update? If so, I'm impressed, and "thank you!" to all involved.
Apple and MacPorts have long since washed their h
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 3:00 AM, Bill Janssen wrote:
>> Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, I am aware of this. I have fixed today most remaining issues, and
>>> fixing the final ones right now.
>>
>> Just FYI: the "AMD64 Snow Leopard" buildbot a
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 3:00 AM, Bill Janssen wrote:
> Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>
>> Yes, I am aware of this. I have fixed today most remaining issues, and
>> fixing the final ones right now.
>
> Just FYI: the "AMD64 Snow Leopard" buildbot and "PPC Leopard" buildbots
> are now green, but the "PPC Tige
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> Yes, I am aware of this. I have fixed today most remaining issues, and
> fixing the final ones right now.
Just FYI: the "AMD64 Snow Leopard" buildbot and "PPC Leopard" buildbots
are now green, but the "PPC Tiger" buildbot is still failing for all
branches because of packagi
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We recently got a couple of new stable buildbots:
> - R. David Murray's "x86 Gentoo" machine, which builds in non-debug
> mode and therefore checks that release Pythons work fine
> - Stefan Krah's "AMD64 FreeBSD 8.2" machine
>
Hello,
We recently got a couple of new stable buildbots:
- R. David Murray's "x86 Gentoo" machine, which builds in non-debug
mode and therefore checks that release Pythons work fine
- Stefan Krah's "AMD64 FreeBSD 8.2" machine
- Bill Janssen's "AMD64 Snow Leopard" machine
Many stable buildbots
12 matches
Mail list logo
