On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:03 PM, scott mc wrote:
> I built 2.7 on Haiku, but am getting failures in the regression tests.
> Many of them are in math related tests, failing in the 15th decimal
> place on test_decimal and a few others like that, I posted a ticket on
> Haiku's trac for that as it m
The config.guess/.sub files in python/trunk/Modules/_ctypes/libffi are
from , which is just before Haiku was finally added to the offical
versions from gnulib.
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=config.git;a=blob_plain;f=config.guess;hb=HEAD
and
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=config.git;
> I don't see such a commitment in this case, but if a
> believable one comes up I'm sure Martin would happily revert his
> position.
Indeed. I have myself added support for AtheOS, even though I had
never used the system. The AtheOS maintainer ran away, the code
rotted, and eventually get ripped
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
wrote:
> -On [20090115 16:53], Guido van Rossum (gu...@python.org) wrote:
>>Did you look at the patch they submitted? http://bugs.python.org/issue4933
>
> I did now (python-2.5.4-haiku-2.diff). I am not sure what you are implying
> tho
-On [20090115 16:53], Guido van Rossum (gu...@python.org) wrote:
>Did you look at the patch they submitted? http://bugs.python.org/issue4933
I did now (python-2.5.4-haiku-2.diff). I am not sure what you are implying
though, Guido. It doesn't look like a huge change and most of it is close to
'one
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> actively working on POSIX compliance. My only guess right now is that this
> work is largely complete. In effect that would mean that Python would work
> out of the box, more or less. So the cost of adding and maintaining it in
This is very interesting to kno
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
wrote:
> -On [20090115 01:11], Guido van Rossum (gu...@python.org) wrote:
>>I'm with Martin. In these days of distributed version control systems,
>>I would think that the effort for the Haiku folks to maintain a branch
>>of Python in
-On [20090115 01:11], Guido van Rossum (gu...@python.org) wrote:
>I'm with Martin. In these days of distributed version control systems,
>I would think that the effort for the Haiku folks to maintain a branch
>of Python in their own version control would be minimal. It is likely
>that for each new
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I'm with Martin. In these days of distributed version control systems,
> I would think that the effort for the Haiku folks to maintain a branch
> of Python in their own version control would be minimal. It is likely
> that for each new Pyt
I'm with Martin. In these days of distributed version control systems,
I would think that the effort for the Haiku folks to maintain a branch
of Python in their own version control would be minimal. It is likely
that for each new Python version that comes out, initially it is
broken on Haiku, and t
Raymond> The theory is that we don't want to support minority operation
Raymond> systems. My view is that we should support those systems to
Raymond> the extent that someone like the OP is willing to maintain the
Raymond> handful of deltas needed to get all tests to pass (the OP's
Martin closed a patch http://bugs.python.org/issue4933 for adding support so
that Python runs on Haiku.
The theory is that we don't want to support minority operation systems. My view is that we should support those systems to the
extent that someone like the OP is willing to maintain the hand
12 matches
Mail list logo
