On 21/12/12 07:05, csebasha wrote:
Hello Mark,
Did you raise bug for this?
No need now. The hash randomization, which was added a while ago,
will render the tests obsolete.
Cheers,
Mark.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mai
Hello Mark,
Did you raise bug for this?
--
View this message in context:
http://python.6.n6.nabble.com/Testing-the-tests-by-modifying-the-ordering-of-dict-items-tp3221386p5000138.html
Sent from the Python - python-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Jan 05, 2012, at 01:46 PM, Mark Shannon wrote:
>2. Submit a bug report for each "failing" test separately?
I'm sure it will be a pain, but this is really the best thing to do.
-Barry
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.pyth
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 13:46:52 +
Mark Shannon wrote:
>
> Should I:
>
> 1. Submit one big bug report?
>
> 2. Submit a bug report for each "failing" test separately?
I would say a separate bug report for each failing test file, i.e. one
report for test_dis, one for test_email etc.
Hope this do
Hi,
Python code should not depend upon the ordering of items in a dict.
Unfortunately it seems that a number of tests in the standard library do
just that.
Changing PyDict_MINSIZE from 8 to either 4 or 16 causes the following
tests to fail:
test_dis test_email test_inspect test_nntplib tes
