Re: [Python-Dev] The fate of 3.0.*

2009-02-14 Thread Brett Cannon
Don't rely on me getting importlib bootstrapped in by 3.1. It would be great if I pull it off, but I am afraid that is being optimistic. The library itself should definitely be done, though. On Feb 13, 2009 7:56 PM, "Antoine Pitrou" wrote: Benjamin Peterson python.org> writes: > > Are we going

Re: [Python-Dev] The fate of 3.0.*

2009-02-14 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Feb 13, 2009, at 10:02 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: Amen. I can see two scenarios where we might release 3.0.2: (a) if we find a really severe error in 3.0.1 (or perhaps a security problem); (b) if 3.1 ends up getting delayed severely. In case (a

Re: [Python-Dev] The fate of 3.0.*

2009-02-14 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Benjamin Peterson wrote: > Are we going to keep developing the 3.0 maintenance branch in > expectation of releasing 3.0.2 sometime or will we just focus our > efforts on 3.1? Traditionally, we had one last bugfix release after then next feature release. So I think we should release 3.0.2 right aft

Re: [Python-Dev] The fate of 3.0.*

2009-02-13 Thread Andrew McNamara
>So what are the expected efforts for 3.1? >- io-in-C >- import-in-Python >- ... anything else? A fixed "email" module. -- Andrew McNamara, Senior Developer, Object Craft http://www.object-craft.com.au/ ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.or

Re: [Python-Dev] The fate of 3.0.*

2009-02-13 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Benjamin Peterson python.org> writes: > > Are we going to keep developing the 3.0 maintenance branch in > expectation of releasing 3.0.2 sometime or will we just focus our > efforts on 3.1? Focusing on 3.1 should be ok. So what are the expected efforts for 3.1? - io-in-C - import-in-Python - ..

Re: [Python-Dev] The fate of 3.0.*

2009-02-13 Thread Guido van Rossum
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 18:35, Benjamin Peterson > wrote: >> >> Are we going to keep developing the 3.0 maintenance branch in >> expectation of releasing 3.0.2 sometime or will we just focus our >> efforts on 3.1? > > I almost said "of course

Re: [Python-Dev] The fate of 3.0.*

2009-02-13 Thread Brett Cannon
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 18:35, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > Are we going to keep developing the 3.0 maintenance branch in > expectation of releasing 3.0.2 sometime or will we just focus our > efforts on 3.1? > I almost said "of course we are", but then I realized that 3.1 is going to be very simila

[Python-Dev] The fate of 3.0.*

2009-02-13 Thread Benjamin Peterson
Are we going to keep developing the 3.0 maintenance branch in expectation of releasing 3.0.2 sometime or will we just focus our efforts on 3.1? -- Regards, Benjamin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinf