On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:58 AM, R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
..
I believe MAL's thought was that the addition of these methods had
been approved pre-moratorium, but I don't know if that is a
sufficient
Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:58 AM, R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com
wrote:
..
I believe MAL's thought was that the addition of these methods had
been approved pre-moratorium, but I don't
On 09/12/2010 15:03, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Guido van Rossumgu...@python.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:58 AM, R. David Murrayrdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
..
I believe MAL's thought was that the addition of these methods had
Michael Foord wrote:
On 09/12/2010 15:03, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Guido van Rossumgu...@python.org
wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:58 AM, R. David
Murrayrdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
..
I believe MAL's thought was that the
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:03 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
..
The ticket that introduced the change is
currently closed [3] even though the last message suggests that at
least part of the change needs to be reverted.
That's for Guido to decide.
The
Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:03 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
..
The ticket that introduced the change is
currently closed [3] even though the last message suggests that at
least part of the change needs to be reverted.
