On 21 Jan 2005, at 08:18, Stuart Bishop wrote:
Just van Rossum wrote:
Skip Montanaro wrote:
Just re.sub([\r\n]+, \n, s) and I think you're good to go.
I don't think that in general you want to fold multiple empty lines
into
one. This would be my prefered regex:
s = re.sub(r\r\n?, \n, s)
On Jan 21, 2005, at 7:44, Jack Jansen wrote:
On 21 Jan 2005, at 08:18, Stuart Bishop wrote:
Just van Rossum wrote:
Skip Montanaro wrote:
Just re.sub([\r\n]+, \n, s) and I think you're good to go.
I don't think that in general you want to fold multiple empty lines
into
one. This would be my
Just Skip Montanaro wrote:
Just re.sub([\r\n]+, \n, s) and I think you're good to go.
Just I don't think that in general you want to fold multiple empty
Just lines into one.
Whoops. Yes.
Skip
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Just van Rossum wrote:
Skip Montanaro wrote:
Just re.sub([\r\n]+, \n, s) and I think you're good to go.
I don't think that in general you want to fold multiple empty lines into
one. This would be my prefered regex:
s = re.sub(r\r\n?, \n, s)
Catches both DOS and old-style Mac line endings.
There is a discussion going on at the moment in postgresql-general about
plpythonu (which allows you write stored procedures in Python) and line
endings. The discussion starts here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2005-01/msg00792.php
The problem appears to be that things are
Stuart I don't think it is possible for plpythonu to fix this by simply
Stuart translating the line endings, as this would require significant
Stuart knowledge of Python syntax to do correctly (triple quoted
Stuart strings and character escaping I think).
I don't see why not. If
