Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, we need a new PEP author who can take the current
> discussion and turn it into a coherent PEP.
I'm not sure that I have time to be the official champion. Right
now I'm spending some time to collect all the ideas presented in the
email message
Skip has mentioned in private email that he's not available to update
PEP 332. I've therefore rejected that PEP; the current ideas are
rather different so we might as well start a new PEP. Anyway, we need
a new PEP author who can take the current discussion and turn it into
a coherent PEP. I've tri
