Could somebody please clarify the status of PEP 3124? At
http://ftp.python.org/dev/peps/ , it is listed as under
consideration, but http://ftp.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3124/ says it
has been deferred.
This isn't really contradictory. under consideration means in
progress: it has neither been
Hi Martin,
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
Could somebody please clarify the status of PEP 3124? At
http://ftp.python.org/dev/peps/ , it is listed as under
consideration, but http://ftp.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3124/ says it
has been deferred.
This
2009/9/13 Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com:
If Phillip doesn't respond here, you may want to ask him directly.
My impression is that it is deferred because nobody is pursuing it
actively (including Phillip Eby). It's common for a PEP to be in that
state for several years, deferred then is an
Hi Paul,
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/9/13 Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com:
If Phillip doesn't respond here, you may want to ask him directly.
My impression is that it is deferred because nobody is pursuing it
actively (including Phillip Eby).
At 08:29 AM 9/13/2009 +0200, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Could somebody please clarify the status of PEP 3124? At
http://ftp.python.org/dev/peps/ , it is listed as under
consideration, but http://ftp.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3124/ says it
has been deferred.
This isn't really contradictory. under
Could somebody please clarify the status of PEP 3124? At
http://ftp.python.org/dev/peps/ , it is listed as under
consideration, but http://ftp.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3124/ says it
has been deferred.
I was reading through the discussion on the python-3000 mailing list
archive, and at one point
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
I would be very interested in seeing a framework for generic functions
in the numpy standard library.
Sorry, I meant to say python standard library
___
Python-Dev mailing list
