On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 22:22:05 -0400
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:36:03 +0200, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:19:45 -0400
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
Besides, hg status is meant to show
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:35:24 +0200
eric.araujo python-check...@python.org wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/bdad5bc9a2ed
changeset: 71562:bdad5bc9a2ed
branch: 3.2
user:Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org
date:Thu Jul 28 22:45:46 2011 +0200
summary:
Stop ignoring
Le 29/07/2011 14:50, Antoine Pitrou a écrit :
changeset: 71562:bdad5bc9a2ed
user:Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org
summary:
Stop ignoring Mercurial merge conflits files (#12255).
R. David Murray and I think that it’s more useful to have these files
show up in the output of “hg
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:28:44 +0200
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org wrote:
Le 29/07/2011 14:50, Antoine Pitrou a écrit :
changeset: 71562:bdad5bc9a2ed
user:Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org
summary:
Stop ignoring Mercurial merge conflits files (#12255).
R. David Murray and I
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:28:44 +0200, =?UTF-8?B?w4lyaWMgQXJhdWpv?=
mer...@netwok.org wrote:
Le 29/07/2011 14:50, Antoine Pitrou a écrit :
changeset: 71562:bdad5bc9a2ed
user:Ãric Araujo mer...@netwok.org
summary:
Stop ignoring Mercurial merge conflits files (#12255).
R.
People confused by the merge/resolve system could exit their merge tool
without actually merging the changes (I know it happened to me!), so
these files act as a reminder that not everything is right.
I don't know, I don't use a merge tool. But presumably the merge tool
would only call hg
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:38:31 +0200, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:28:44 +0200 Ãric Araujo mer...@netwok.org wrote:
make clean removes generated files, but *.rej and *.orig are backups,
which you may want to save or re-apply.
What use are these backups
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:21:42 +0200
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org wrote:
What use are these backups really? We are using a (D)VCS, you are not
losing anything.
The .orig files after a revert could contain code that’s not committed
anywhere. See also RDM’s reply to your message.
I would
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:49:35 +0200, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:21:42 +0200 mer...@netwok.org wrote:
What use are these backups really? We are using a (D)VCS, you are not
losing anything.
The .orig files after a revert could contain code thatâs not
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:19:45 -0400
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
Besides, hg status is meant to show untracked files which could
*potentially* be tracked. It's not like anybody wants to track .orig
and .rej files, so having them in the ignore list is still the right
thing
Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net writes:
Besides, hg status is meant to show untracked files which could
*potentially* be tracked.
And if you don't want to track them, you need to deal with them somehow.
It's not like anybody wants to track .orig and .rej files, so having
them in the
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:36:03 +0200, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:19:45 -0400
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
Besides, hg status is meant to show untracked files which could
*potentially* be tracked. It's not like anybody wants to track
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 7:22 PM, R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:36:03 +0200, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:19:45 -0400
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
Besides, hg status is meant to show untracked files
13 matches
Mail list logo