On Tue, September 9, 2008 12:49 pm, Bill Janssen wrote:
>> IMHO, this severely limits the new ssl module's utility, and discourages
>> good security practices.
>
> Please file a bug report. A bug report with a patch and tests would
> be even better :-). Assign it to me.
I filed one, but the bug
> It accept them only as
> paths to their location on the file system, which I believe means that a
> server can only support SSL if it has read permission to its private key
> file when client connections arrive. This is a problem for servers that
> bind to their socket and drop privileges as soo
I've been trying out the new ssl module, and I love it so far, except for
the way it accepts private keys and certificates. It accept them only as
paths to their location on the file system, which I believe means that a
server can only support SSL if it has read permission to its private key
file
