> Looking at http://docs.python.org/lib/module-os.html, I find the following:
>
> name
>
> The name of the operating system dependent module imported. The
> following names have currently been registered: 'posix', 'nt', 'mac',
> 'os2', 'ce', 'java', 'riscos'.
>
> This implies tha
Looking at http://docs.python.org/lib/module-os.html, I find the following:
name
The name of the operating system dependent module imported. The
following names have currently been registered: 'posix', 'nt', 'mac',
'os2', 'ce', 'java', 'riscos'.
This implies that there's a regist
Great idea! Sounds like a PEP (informational, probably) would be good idea.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think this is bike-shedding.
>
> The debate about "AMD64" vs. "amd64" vs. "x86_64" reminded me that
> I've been bit more and more frequen
I don't think this is bike-shedding.
The debate about "AMD64" vs. "amd64" vs. "x86_64" reminded me that
I've been bit more and more frequently by bits of platform-specific
knowledge scattered around the standard library. The latest is the
code in distutils.unixccompiler that tries to figure out w
