Re: [Python-Dev] python3k vs _ast

2010-11-17 Thread Oleg Broytman
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:19:35AM -0500, R. David Murray wrote: > On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:36:37 -0600, Benjamin Peterson > wrote: > > 2010/11/17 Oleg Broytman : > > > Seems to be rather a usage question, not a development question > > > (python-dev > > > is about *developing* python, not *using*

Re: [Python-Dev] python3k vs _ast

2010-11-17 Thread R. David Murray
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:36:37 -0600, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > 2010/11/17 Oleg Broytman : > > Seems to be rather a usage question, not a development question (python-dev > > is about *developing* python, not *using* it). > > Well, technically I think it's a feature request. > > > > > On Wed, No

Re: [Python-Dev] python3k vs _ast

2010-11-17 Thread Emile Anclin
On Wednesday 17 November 2010 14:36:37 Benjamin Peterson wrote: > I wouldn't object to adding them back if you want to file a bug report. Ok, thank you for quick reply. here is the issue : http://bugs.python.org/issue10445 -- Emile Anclin http://www.logilab.fr/ http://www.logilab.org/ Info

Re: [Python-Dev] python3k vs _ast

2010-11-17 Thread Benjamin Peterson
2010/11/17 Oleg Broytman : > Seems to be rather a usage question, not a development question (python-dev > is about *developing* python, not *using* it). Well, technically I think it's a feature request. > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 01:48:06PM +0100, Emile Anclin wrote: >> hello everybody, >> >> m

Re: [Python-Dev] python3k vs _ast

2010-11-17 Thread Oleg Broytman
Seems to be rather a usage question, not a development question (python-dev is about *developing* python, not *using* it). On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 01:48:06PM +0100, Emile Anclin wrote: > hello everybody, > > migrating Pylint to python3.x, we encounter a little problem : > in the tree generated by

[Python-Dev] python3k vs _ast

2010-11-17 Thread Emile Anclin
hello everybody, migrating Pylint to python3.x, we encounter a little problem : in the tree generated by _ast, if we consider a "args" node (representing an argument of a function), the "lineno" (and the "col_offset") information disappeared from those nodes. Is there a particular reason for th