On Nov 24, 2007 1:57 PM, Titus Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 10:23:06AM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> -> On Nov 24, 2007 6:35 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -> > Thanks, Titus. Both the doctest and trace tests pass with your change.
> -> > Checked back in. I did
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 10:23:06AM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
-> On Nov 24, 2007 6:35 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-> > Thanks, Titus. Both the doctest and trace tests pass with your change.
-> > Checked back in. I didn't run the full test suite, as test_sqlite causes a
-> > bus error on m
On Nov 24, 2007 6:35 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, Titus. Both the doctest and trace tests pass with your change.
> Checked back in. I didn't run the full test suite, as test_sqlite causes a
> bus error on my Mac which I've yet to investigate.
It's easy though to run all tests *excep
Titus> Skip, this set_trace rewrite fixes the problem in both 25-maint and
Titus> trunk:
...
Thanks, Titus. Both the doctest and trace tests pass with your change.
Checked back in. I didn't run the full test suite, as test_sqlite causes a
bus error on my Mac which I've yet to inves
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 10:32:25PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
->
-> Brett> Looks like Skip's r59137 fix for working with tracing has led to
-> Brett> test_doctest to be broken on 2.5 and the trunk (at least
-> Brett> according to the buildbots). Can someone either revert the
->
Brett> Looks like Skip's r59137 fix for working with tracing has led to
Brett> test_doctest to be broken on 2.5 and the trunk (at least
Brett> according to the buildbots). Can someone either revert the
Brett> commit or fix it? I would normally do it myself but US
Brett> Thank
Looks like Skip's r59137 fix for working with tracing has led to
test_doctest to be broken on 2.5 and the trunk (at least according to
the buildbots). Can someone either revert the commit or fix it? I
would normally do it myself but US Thanksgiving has me tied up to not
do too much beyond bitchin
