First, thanks to all the python core devs (and others) who work on
Python - many, many people (myself included) benefit from your work.
Suggestion below...
On 5/23/19 9:02 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On May 23, 2019, at 14:17, Brett Cannon wrote:
I'm personally viewing it as a first step in add
On Fri, May 24, 2019, 08:08 Ben Cail wrote:
>
> Why not have the PSF hire someone (or multiple people) to be paid to
> work on the maintenance burden? This could be similar to the Django
> fellows:
> https://www.djangoproject.com/fundraising/#who-is-the-django-fellow. It
> seems like a good thing
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:07 AM Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019, 08:08 Ben Cail wrote:
>
>>
>> Why not have the PSF hire someone (or multiple people) to be paid to
>> work on the maintenance burden? This could be similar to the Django
>> fellows:
>> https://www.djangoproject.com/f
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:03 AM Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On May 20, 2019, at 13:15, Christian Heimes wrote:
> >
> > here is the first version of my PEP 594 to deprecate and eventually
> remove modules from the standard library. The PEP started last year with
> talk during the Python Language Summi
On May 23, 2019, at 14:17, Brett Cannon wrote:
> I'm personally viewing it as a first step in addressing the maintenance
> burden we have with such a large stdlib. Christian started this work over a
> year ago and I think it's worth seeing through. After that we should probably
> have a discus
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 2:18 PM Brett Cannon wrote:
> I'm personally viewing it as a first step in addressing the maintenance
> burden we have with such a large stdlib. Christian started this work over a
> year ago and I think it's worth seeing through. After that we should probably
> have a di
