> Some quick searching shows that there is at least hope Microsoft is on
> board with C++11x (not so surprising, their crown jewels are written
> in C++). We should at some point demand a C++ compiler for CPython
> and pick of subset of C++ features to allow use of but that is likely
> reserved fo
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:41 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Am 07.02.2012 20:10, schrieb Gregory P. Smith:
>> Why do we still care about C89? It is 2012 and we're talking about
>> Python 3. What compiler on what platform that anyone actually cares
>> about does not support C99?
>
> As Amaury says
