On 05/07/2016 04:06 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
I just reviewed an issue on the tracker, and found that many, if not
all, of my comments made at the time I completely disagree with (both
now, and before -- I'm going to claim sleep deprivation).
Obviously I should post a new comment explaining my th
On 8 May 2016 at 20:56, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 04:06:51PM -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
>> I just reviewed an issue on the tracker, and found that many, if not
>> all, of my comments made at the time I completely disagree with (both
>> now, and before -- I'm going to claim s
On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 04:06:51PM -0700, Ethan Furman wrote:
> I just reviewed an issue on the tracker, and found that many, if not
> all, of my comments made at the time I completely disagree with (both
> now, and before -- I'm going to claim sleep deprivation).
>
> Obviously I should post a n
On 7 May 2016 at 23:23, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 4:17 PM, MRAB wrote:
>>
>> I think you shouldn't delete them. It would be better just to say that
>> you've changed your mind and explain why.
>
>
> I support this. Please leave your new comments correcting previous one and
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 4:17 PM, MRAB wrote:
> I think you shouldn't delete them. It would be better just to say that
> you've changed your mind and explain why.
>
I support this. Please leave your new comments correcting previous one and
support your current stance. I think, it is alright to mak
On 2016-05-08 00:06, Ethan Furman wrote:
I just reviewed an issue on the tracker, and found that many, if not
all, of my comments made at the time I completely disagree with (both
now, and before -- I'm going to claim sleep deprivation).
Obviously I should post a new comment explaining my though
I think if you leave a comment that to deleted your own comments and why
you did it then it's fine.
On Sat, May 7, 2016, 16:07 Ethan Furman wrote:
> I just reviewed an issue on the tracker, and found that many, if not
> all, of my comments made at the time I completely disagree with (both
> now,