[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> @@ -399,9 +393,8 @@
> del self[name] # Won't fail if it doesn't exist
> self.dict[name.lower()] = value
> text = name + ": " + value
> -lines = text.split("\n")
> -for line in lines:
> -self.headers.append(line + "\n")
Patch review [ 981773 ] crach link c++ extension by mingw
When building a C++ extension for Windows using MinGW, the linking would fail
due to an incorrect link command. The patch contains a solution for this problem.
I could reproduce this bug with Python 2.3.5c1, but in Python 2.4 it seems to
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
The most recent test_codecs check-in (1.19) is failing on a MSCV6.0
compilation running on WinMe:
--
Ran 35 tests in 1.430s
FAILED (failures=1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
> [...]
test.test_support.T
Walter Dörwald wrote:
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
The most recent test_codecs check-in (1.19) is failing on a MSCV6.0
compilation running on WinMe:
--
Ran 35 tests in 1.430s
FAILED (failures=1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
> [.
>> @@ -399,9 +393,8 @@
>> del self[name] # Won't fail if it doesn't exist
>> self.dict[name.lower()] = value
>> text = name + ": " + value
>> -lines = text.split("\n")
>> -for line in lines:
>> -self.headers.append(line + "\n")
>> +self.h
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 10:10:49 +0100, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> @@ -399,9 +393,8 @@
> >> del self[name] # Won't fail if it doesn't exist
> >> self.dict[name.lower()] = value
> >> text = name + ": " + value
> >> -lines = text.split("\n")
> >> -
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 10:35, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> This would have been caught if there was a unit test validating what
> the documentation says. Why aren't there unit tests for this code? I
> think we need to raise the bar for "wholistic" improvements to a
> module: first write a unit test if
> The md5.h/md5c.c files allow "copy and use", but no modification of
> the files. There are some alternative implementations, i.e. in glibc,
> openssl, so a replacement should be sage. Any other requirements when
> considering a replacement?
>
> Matthias
I believe the "plan" for md5 and sh
[Matthias Klose]
> A Debian user pointed out (http://bugs.debian.org/293932), that the
> current license for the Python profiler is not conforming to the DFSG
> (Debian free software guidelines).
>
> http://www.python.org/doc/current/lib/node829.html states
>
> "This permission is explicitly restr
Maybe some ambitious PSF activitst could contact Roskind and Steve
Kirsch and see if they know who at Disney to talk to... Or maybe the
Disney guys who were at PyCon last year could help.
Jeremy
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:37:50 -0500, Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Matthias Klose]
> > A De
Anthony Baxter wrote:
I'm currently thinking about a 2.4.1 around the 23td of Feb - Martin and
Fred, does this work for you?
Yes. I will need to test whether my replacement of VB scripts in the
installer with native DLLs works even on W95; I'm confident to complete
this next week (already have the
On behalf of the Python development team and the Python community, I'm
happy to announce the release of Python 2.3.5 (final).
Python 2.3.5 is a bug-fix release. See the release notes at the website
(also available as Misc/NEWS in the source distribution) for details of
the bugs squished in this r
12 matches
Mail list logo
