On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 21:09, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>>Though maybe it should be called Conclusion instead of Accepted and
>>used for Rejected PEPs, as well?
>
> Good point. What do you think about 'Resolution'?
Fine with me.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
___
Python
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
[..]
>>>
>>> Without a BDFL, I think we need a committee to make decisions, e.g. by
>>> majority vote amongst committers.
>>
>> Couldn't we just go with the FLUFL?
>
> IIRC in the IETF this is done by the committee chair. I think it's a
> g
> Of course some PEPs could concern several categories, so we would
> still need some kind of Pep dictator if there's no consensus. So what
> about electing a BPC every year ?
I think having a single body/person pronounce on all PEPs is sufficient;
as that person should certainly listen to the o
Am 29.04.2010 13:40, schrieb R. David Murray:
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 20:16:14 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> Does the online dev version of the docs build in response to docs
>> checkins, or just once a day?
>
> I believe it does it once a day. Georg recently changed how this is done,
> so we shou
Martin v. Löwis v.loewis.de> writes:
>
> I think having a single body/person pronounce on all PEPs is sufficient;
> as that person should certainly listen to the opinions of the respective
> experts.
The issue is more a question of personal bandwidth. Giving an informed decision
requires reading
> Then it's not obvious that we will have many PEPs in the future.
Given Guido's Theorem: the PEPs yet to be written will hopefully
outnumber the PEPs written so far.
Regards,
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.o
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Martin v. Löwis v.loewis.de> writes:
>>
>> I think having a single body/person pronounce on all PEPs is sufficient;
>> as that person should certainly listen to the opinions of the respective
>> experts.
>
> The issue is more a question of
On Sat, 01 May 2010 11:35:04 +0200, Georg Brandl wrote:
> Am 29.04.2010 13:40, schrieb R. David Murray:
> > On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 20:16:14 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> >> Does the online dev version of the docs build in response to docs
> >> checkins, or just once a day?
> >
> > I believe it does i
On 1 May 2010 15:28, R. David Murray wrote:
> Unless I'm missing something, I don't see any docs there about the
> automated build process and when and where it runs.
I assume Georg was referring to "Development versions of the Python
documentation are available on-line and updated daily".
Paul.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jesse Noller wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Benjamin Peterson
>> wrote:
>>> 2010/4/30 Maciej Fijalkowski :
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Benjamin Peterson
wrote:
>
On Sat, 01 May 2010 16:18:19 +0100, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 1 May 2010 15:28, R. David Murray wrote:
> > Unless I'm missing something, I don't see any docs there about the
> > automated build process and when and where it runs.
>
> I assume Georg was referring to "Development versions of the Pyth
R. David Murray wrote:
> On Sat, 01 May 2010 16:18:19 +0100, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On 1 May 2010 15:28, R. David Murray wrote:
>>> Unless I'm missing something, I don't see any docs there about the
>>> automated build process and when and where it runs.
>> I assume Georg was referring to "Developm
Paul Moore wrote:
> On 1 May 2010 15:28, R. David Murray wrote:
>> Unless I'm missing something, I don't see any docs there about the
>> automated build process and when and where it runs.
>
> I assume Georg was referring to "Development versions of the Python
> documentation are available on-lin
13 matches
Mail list logo
