If build slave owners could let me know when their machine has VS2010
I'd appreciate it. I got the go-ahead to commit the port but want to
wait until the build slaves are ready for it.
Please don't wait, but let the build slaves break. This is getting urgent.
Regards,
Martin
_
-self.sizeof_void_p = get_config_var('SIZEOF_VOID_P')
+self.sizeof_void_p = get_config_var('SIZEOF_VOID_P') \
+if sys.platform != 'darwin' else None
if not self.sizeof_void_p:
-self.sizeof_void_p = 8 if architecture()[0] == '64b
"Martin v. L?wis" wrote:
[http://bugs.python.org/issue14779]
>> -self.sizeof_void_p = get_config_var('SIZEOF_VOID_P')
>> +self.sizeof_void_p = get_config_var('SIZEOF_VOID_P') \
>> +if sys.platform != 'darwin' else None
>> if not self.sizeof
There is fear and uncertainty in this pull request to PyPI -
https://bitbucket.org/techtonik/pypi-techtonik/changeset/5396f8c60d49#comment-18915
- which is about that writing to stderr _might_ break things in WSGI
applications.
As a consequence logging to console will not be accepted in debug
mode
On Sun, 13 May 2012 14:02:50 +0300
anatoly techtonik wrote:
> There is fear and uncertainty in this pull request to PyPI -
> https://bitbucket.org/techtonik/pypi-techtonik/changeset/5396f8c60d49#comment-18915
> - which is about that writing to stderr _might_ break things in WSGI
> applications.
>
Am 13.05.2012 13:09, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
> On Sun, 13 May 2012 14:02:50 +0300
> anatoly techtonik wrote:
>> There is fear and uncertainty in this pull request to PyPI -
>> https://bitbucket.org/techtonik/pypi-techtonik/changeset/5396f8c60d49#comment-18915
>> - which is about that writing to st
On 13.05.12 12:48, Stefan Krah wrote:
The C standard doesn't guarantee sizeof(void *) == sizeof(size_t). In
fact, there are machines where sizeof(void *)> sizeof(size_t):
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.programming.garbage-collection.boehmgc/651
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?ui
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 2:30 AM, wrote:
>> If build slave owners could let me know when their machine has VS2010
>> I'd appreciate it. I got the go-ahead to commit the port but want to
>> wait until the build slaves are ready for it.
>
>
> Please don't wait, but let the build slaves break. This i
