On Feb 22 2018, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> 1. Inner generator expression:
>
> result = [y + g(y) for y in (f(x) for x in range(10))]
>
[...]
>
> And maybe there are other ways.
I think the syntax recently brough up by Nick is still the most
beautiful:
result = [ (f(x) as y) + g(y) for x i
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:02 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> On Feb 22 2018, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
>> 1. Inner generator expression:
>>
>> result = [y + g(y) for y in (f(x) for x in range(10))]
>>
> [...]
>>
>> And maybe there are other ways.
>
> I think the syntax recently brough up by Nick is
On Feb 25 2018, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:02 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> On Feb 22 2018, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
>>> 1. Inner generator expression:
>>>
>>> result = [y + g(y) for y in (f(x) for x in range(10))]
>>>
>> [...]
>>>
>>> And maybe there are other ways.
>>
Le 25/02/2018 à 14:11, Nikolaus Rath a écrit :
> On Feb 25 2018, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:02 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>>> On Feb 22 2018, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
1. Inner generator expression:
result = [y + g(y) for y in (f(x) for x in range(10))]
23.02.18 19:30, Guido van Rossum пише:
I'm not saying anything new here, but since you asked specifically for
my opinion: I don't care for the idiom; it's never occurred to me
before, and it smells of cleverness. If I saw it in a code review I
would probably ask for a regular for-loop to make t
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:11 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> On Feb 25 2018, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:02 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>>> On Feb 22 2018, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
1. Inner generator expression:
result = [y + g(y) for y in (f(x) for x in range
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 6:36 AM, Serhiy Storchaka
wrote:
> 23.02.18 19:30, Guido van Rossum пише:
>
>> I'm not saying anything new here, but since you asked specifically for my
>> opinion: I don't care for the idiom; it's never occurred to me before, and
>> it smells of cleverness. If I saw it in
Thanks. Do you know if this gets backported to 3.7?
Eric.
On 2/25/2018 1:36 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 2/25/2018 11:56 AM, Eric V. Smith wrote:
+ # specify any value in the deecorator).
I fixed this through the web interface. The CI now knows that a comment
change does not need test
Just a reminder that 3.7.0b2 is almost upon us. Please get your feature
fixes, bug fixes, and documentation updates in before 2018-02-26 ~23:59
Anywhere on Earth (UTC-12:00). That's a little over 1.5 days from now.
Also, as previously noted, for those of you who asked for and received
extensions fo
