Hi,
Yury Selivanov pushed his implementation of the PEP 567 -- Context
Variables at January 23, 2018. Yesterday, 4 months after the commit
and only 3 weeks before 3.7.0 final release, a crash has been found in
the implementation:
https://bugs.python.org/issue33803
(it's now fixed, don't worry Ned!
2018-06-07 4:45 GMT+02:00 Mariatta Wijaya :
> Are there APIs we can use to check the status of builbots?
Buildbots offer different ways to send notifications: emails and IRC
bot for example.
If you want to *poll* for recent builds, I don't know. I would suggest
to use notifications (push) rather
08.06.18 10:48, Victor Stinner пише:
Yury Selivanov pushed his implementation of the PEP 567 -- Context
Variables at January 23, 2018. Yesterday, 4 months after the commit
and only 3 weeks before 3.7.0 final release, a crash has been found in
the implementation:
https://bugs.python.org/issue33803
2018-06-04 18:31 GMT+02:00 Victor Stinner :
> Quick update a few days later.
> (...)
> Except Windows 7 which has issues with test_asyncio and
> multiprocessing tests because this buildbot is slow, it seems like
> most CIs are now stable.
The bug wasn't specific to this buildbot, it was a very old
2018-06-08 10:17 GMT+02:00 Serhiy Storchaka :
> Reducing GC threshold can hide other bugs that will be reproducible only in
> the release mode (because of earlier releasing of resources or changed order
> of destroying objects).
>
> What is the cost of traversing all objects? Would it be too high i
08.06.18 11:31, Victor Stinner пише:
Do you suggest to trigger a fake "GC collection" which would just
visit all objects with a no-op visit callback? I like the idea!
Yeah, that would help to detect objects in an inconsistent state and
reuse the existing implemented visit methods of all types.
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 06:02:40PM +0100, MRAB wrote:
> The Python community _is_ meant to be inclusive, and we should support
> the addition of ginger emoijs. :-)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVN_0qvuhhw
--
Steve
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Pyth
> On 8 Jun 2018, at 12:36, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
>
> 08.06.18 11:31, Victor Stinner пише:
>> Do you suggest to trigger a fake "GC collection" which would just
>> visit all objects with a no-op visit callback? I like the idea!
>>
>> Yeah, that would help to detect objects in an inconsistent s
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2018-06-01 - 2018-06-08)
Python tracker at https://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open6691 ( +8)
closed 38869 (+66)
total 45560 (+74)
Open issues wi
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 9:24 AM Ronald Oussoren wrote:
[..]
> Wouldn’t it be enough to visit just the the newly tracked object in
> PyObject_GC_Track with a visitor function that does something minimal to
> verify that the object value is sane, for example by checking
> PyType_Ready(Py_TYPE(op))
On 06/06/2018 03:51 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 6 June 2018 at 15:31, Rob Cliffe via Python-Dev mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> ...
> *In other words, it looks as if in Python 3.6.5, the compiled list
comprehension**
> **can "see" a pre-existing global variable but not a local on
Am I correct in saying that the consensus is +1 for inclusion in v3.8?
The last point in the thread was INADA Naoki researching various
implementations and deciding that it's OK to include this feature in 3.8.
As I understand it, Guido was in agreement with INADA's advice to wait for
MicroPython's
> Is this a bug or a feature?
The bug was me being so excited about the new construct (I pushed in
someone else's work, can't recall who now, maybe Fredrik Lundh?) that
I didn't consider that leaking the loop variable out of the list
comprehension was a bad idea. Think of the Py3 behavior as one o
That sounds right to me. We will then have had two versions where this was
the case:
- 3.6 where order preserving was implemented in CPython but in the language
spec
- 3.7 where it was also added to the language spec
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Michael Selik wrote:
> Am I correct in saying
+1 -- thanks so much for acting as our scribe again!
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 5:47 PM, Eric Snow
wrote:
> Thanks for doing this Jake.
>
> -eric
>
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 3:56 PM, Jake Edge wrote:
> >
> > Hola python-dev,
> >
> > I have been remiss in posting about my coverage from this year's Py
15 matches
Mail list logo
