Michele Simionato wrote [on c.l.py]:
Brett Cannon:
[... python-dev summary ... boilerplate change ...]
+1 for this idea. The summary looks much better now :)
Keep the good work going,
Sorry, but i have to disagree. I hope you won't take this reply
personally, Michele, since it's directed to all
A recent question on c.l.p pointed out that the 2.4 Decimal implementation
raises TypeError directly for operator arguments it doesn't understand, instead
of returning NotImplemented.
Obviously, this creates problems for anyone trying to define a class that 'plays
nicely' with Decimal (but
A recent question on c.l.p pointed out that the 2.4 Decimal
implementation
raises TypeError directly for operator arguments it doesn't
understand,
instead
of returning NotImplemented.
Obviously, this creates problems for anyone trying to define a class
that
'plays
nicely' with Decimal
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
Try to address this in a larger context than decimal. The same sort of
logic is present in sets.py and in datetime objects.
Interesting. In that case, my other suggestion was to have raising
NotImplementedError from a special method be the equivalent of returning
Hello,
still in 2004, this comment was added to old bugs with groups Python2.*:
Please, could you verify if this problem persists in Python
2.3.4
or 2.4?
If yes, in which version? Can you provide a test case?
If the problem is solved, from which version?
Note that if you fail to answer in
Title: RE: [Python-Dev] Legacy bugs on SF
[Reinhold Birkenfeld]
#- The month is over now, so what to do with them?
The month is like a minimum time limit.
I got separated and moved to my parent house. I still don't have internet connection, so I have this work a bit overdue.
But I'll
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 11:45:43PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Interesting. In that case, my other suggestion was to have raising
NotImplementedError from a special method be the equivalent of returning
NotImplemented (which makes life much easier for a class like Decimal which
has an
Steve Holden wrote:
Now, the reason for this specific rant is this: I can tell a cry for
help when I see one. Brett has done a magnificent job of providing
python-dev summaries since Andrew decided he'd had enough, and he is to
be congratulated for it. I managed to offload another bunch of work
Steve Holden wrote:
Michele Simionato wrote [on c.l.py]:
Brett Cannon:
[... python-dev summary ... boilerplate change ...]
+1 for this idea. The summary looks much better now :)
Keep the good work going,
Sorry, but i have to disagree. I hope you won't take this reply
personally, Michele, since
Ok - Fred and Martin and I will be cutting 2.4.1c1 on March 10th,
and (assuming no problems) 2.4.1 on March 17th. Apologies for
the delay - my time's been all consumed lately with doing lighting
and sound design for a show. (Any Melbournites who're interested,
we're putting on Michael Palin's play
10 matches
Mail list logo
