d the documentation, perhaps more
effective than writing the deprecation warning on the top of the page.
My half-a-cent.
--
Carlos Ribeiro
Consultoria em Projetos
blog: http://rascunhosrotos.blogspot.com
blog: http://pythonnotes.blogspot.com
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
nclude the "Deprecated Modules Reference" in the standard
distribution, but make it available as a separate download.
--
Carlos Ribeiro
Consultoria em Projetos
blog: http://rascunhosrotos.blogspot.com
blog: http://pythonnotes.blogspot.com
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
ot;, or even "site:docs.python.org". Usually Google
does a good job at ranking pages, and if it doesn't rank the main
Python website very highly, it's because they're not being referred
to. A campaign to ask people to put links back to the canonical
documentation
is not to
require recompiling, at least inside the same major release (2.4 to
2.5, for example). That would be really great.
--
Carlos Ribeiro
Consultoria em Projetos
blog: http://rascunhosrotos.blogspot.com
blog: http://pythonnotes.blogspot.com
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 20:36:45 -0500, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-12-12 at 12:32, Carlos Ribeiro wrote:
>
> > For those who believe that a non-profit project should not do any
> > marketing, a reminder. If the perception about Python is one of a
raw execution performance, but only to be fast;
but in this sense, being "fast enough" is the same as being "fast".
So, I would never say, "Python allows you to write fast enough code in
a short time"; I would say "Python allows you to
suring.
As far as the slogan is concerned - I still stand for my proposal, but
I don't know if anyone has registered it first... I fear it is, it
sounds strangely familiar. But I hope not.
p.s. Can someone imagine a Microsoft senior executive saying that "C#
is now faster because
ause that's where the money is. I
personally take it a matter of personal interest, because I know how
hard it is to "sell" Python to companies here in Brazil.
--
Carlos Ribeiro
Consultoria em Projetos
blog: http://rascunhosrotos.
at puts some control on the
hands of the programmer - as long it does not stand in the way between
him and the problem - is good.
--
Carlos Ribeiro
Consultoria em Projetos
blog: http://rascunhosrotos.blogspot.com
blog: http://pythonnotes.blogspot.com
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
er, and allows to write much shorter & cleaner
code. Some balance is needed.
--
Carlos Ribeiro
Consultoria em Projetos
blog: http://rascunhosrotos.blogspot.com
blog: http://pythonnotes.blogspot.com
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
the correct answer.
+1, specially for the last sentence. An adapter with local state is
not an adapter anymore! It's funny how difficult it's to get this...
but it's obvious once stated.
--
Carlos Ribeiro
Consultoria em Projetos
blog: http://rascunhosrotos.blogspot.com
blog: htt
t;) so often that they evolved specific terminology. Let's
> hope it doesn't take OOP many centuries to accept that both "stricto
> sensu inheritance" (Liskovianly-correct) AND "lato sensu inheritance"
> are needed to do _our_ jobs!-)
Good point!
--
Carlos R
12 matches
Mail list logo