Re: python-macros review

2015-12-30 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 12/30/2015 02:48 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> I've submitted a review for a separate python-macros package here: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294904 >> >> This is what the FPC approved here >> https://fedorahosted.org/f

Re: python-macros review

2015-12-30 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > I've submitted a review for a separate python-macros package here: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294904 > > This is what the FPC approved here > https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/567#comment:12 to be added to the Fedora

python-macros review

2015-12-30 Thread Orion Poplawski
I've submitted a review for a separate python-macros package here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294904 This is what the FPC approved here https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/567#comment:12 to be added to the Fedora buildroots to provide the %python3_pkgversion macro needed for com

Re: Additional python34 components for epel7

2015-12-30 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 12/30/2015 10:00 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 12/30/2015 12:16 AM, Denis Fateyev wrote: >> Actually, I've opened a bug against 'msgpack': >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290393 >> >> What we actually need is to clarify and officially approve python3 epel >> proposal and guidel

Re: Additional python34 components for epel7

2015-12-30 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 12/30/2015 12:16 AM, Denis Fateyev wrote: > Actually, I've opened a bug against 'msgpack': > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290393 > > What we actually need is to clarify and officially approve python3 epel > proposal and guidelines, to start packaging things for epel7. > > I'm r