On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 10:20 AM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> With the update to conda 23.5.2 and using the pyproject macros, the
> conda package is no longer producing the /usr/bin/conda-env launcher
> script which is causing problems.
What problems specifically?
> I don't know how I can get that
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 6:45 AM Sandro wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> I'm trying to understand why I'm getting a circular import error running
> tests only in F37 [1].
>
> It's an easy fix adding an empty __init__.py in %prep, but why are F38
> and rawhide buildroots happy not having that file, while F37
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 5:51 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 26. 10. 22 23:19, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> > This list is not sorted, which makes it difficult to scan. Please also
> > provide the maintainers-by-package list that is usually sent for
> > changes t
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 6:41 AM Lumír Balhar wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> Since Python 2.0 (1994), Python provided a useful tool pathfix.py that
> we use in Python RPM macros for fixing shebangs of Python modules and
> some RPM packages use it as well directly in their specfiles for similar
> purposes. T
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 5:28 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hey Pythonistas.
>
> The Python standard library distutils module will be removed from Python 3.12+
>
> https://peps.python.org/pep-0632/
>
> As preparatory work, we build all python packages in a Copr repository with
> Python 3.11 sans distu
Hi,
python-sphinx-panels is currently FTBFS as it does not support Sphinx
5. It is abandoned upstream with the suggestion of sphinx-design
instead.
My package which depended on it has moved to sphinx-design, and I
believe all others have as well. According to repoquery, there should
be no BuildRe
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 17:32, Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Neal Gompa and I have been reviving the effort to get our mailing list
> server infrastructure (currently running on RHEL 7 with missing packages
> provided in an unofficial repo) hostable on RHEL 9 + EPEL.
>
> Pagure issu
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 08:04, Tomáš Orsava wrote:
>
> The downside is that we will have a few thousand (est. 3624 [1])
> additional Obsoletes tags in the Fedora repos that are mostly useless.
> Does anyone see a problem with this? Given the amount of tags already
> present (e.g. 336 thousand provi
On Sun, 22 Aug 2021 at 06:06, Mattia Verga wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
> I'm trying to migrate graphql-server spec file to the newer Python
> guidelines, but I'm hitting some walls.
>
> - Building the package locally went fine, while on Koji [¹] I get:
> error: line 39: Unknown tag: %pyproject_extras
In Dask, they have some extras that have effectively been removed, but
they kept them in their config for backwards compatibility.
In Fedora, I would like to remove the meta-subpackages, as they don't
provide any additional Requires. As such, I would like to Obsolete
them from the main package, an
On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 at 19:51, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 18. 08. 21 11:09, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> > I've been experimenting with the new macros for Python packages, and
> > ran into some issues building Sphinx docs for compiled extensions.
> >
> > Whe
I've been experimenting with the new macros for Python packages, and
ran into some issues building Sphinx docs for compiled extensions.
When building docs, one usually has to be able to import the project.
When the project uses compiled extensions, it is not sufficient to
point to the original unp
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 19:40, Scott Talbert wrote:
>
> On Sun, 15 Aug 2021, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am trying to update spyder on rawhide and F35. The main issue I have is
> >> that pyqt requirements are strict. From the setup file,
> >>
> >> 'pyqt5<5.13',
> >> 'pyqtwebengine<5.
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 at 08:50, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello PyPyistas,
>
> we have renamed the pypy3 package to pypy3.7 (both the component and the
> "binary" package) on Fedora 35+. The package no longer installs to
> /usr/lib64/pypy3-7.x/ but rather to /usr/lib64/pypy3.7/.
>
> *What is this good
I have just retired python-pyinsane2; it has been archived by upstream
in favour of its replacement libinsane. I believe all users in Fedora
have also moved on to using libinsane as well. Since tests have
broken, it is also FTBFS in Rawhide, and I don't intend to invest any
time into fixing it.
--
Hi,
I am retiring python-descartes in Rawhide. Upstream died when
Bitbucket dropped Mercurial support, and has no intention of reviving
it.
Downstream users have stopped using it, and I have removed the
unnecessary dependency from Fedora packages, or patched it out after
reporting upstream.
It i
I am orphaning python-pytest-helpers-namespace, which is no longer a
dependency of my packages.
It currently has one bug report [1] for updating to the latest
version, which has grown a new dependency
(setuptools-declarative-requirements) that I do not wish to also
package.
AFAIK, nothing else de
I'm not sure in which package the error lies here and thus where to
file the bug report. This occurs on only ppc64le with a matplotlib
build [1]. Does anyone have any ideas?
This works:
>>> import wx
>>> from PIL import Image
and this works:
>>> import numpy
>>> from PIL import Image
but if you
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 at 05:11, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 29.8.2018 10:56, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 29.8.2018 05:38, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> >> On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 18:42, Miro Hrončok >> <mailto:mhron...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >&g
On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 18:42, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 17.8.2018 21:51, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 15:18, Miro Hrončok > <mailto:mhron...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 17.8.2018 20:20, José Abílio Mato
On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 15:18, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
>
> On 17.8.2018 20:20, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> > On Friday, 17 August 2018 18.54.59 WEST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> Is there an upstream schedule? That would very much help us to determine
> >> if this is F29 material.
> >
> > You know the ans
Hi all,
In case you weren't aware, Matplotlib 3.0 will drop support for Python 2.
The rc1 was just released today/yesterday, though I have not yet attempted
to see how that update will go. The 2.2.x line will continue to be
supported and receive bug fixes until Python 2 is EOL.
So I'm wondering w
On 16 November 2017 at 01:31, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 16 November 2017 at 12:30, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
>> So - is it possible to build rpms with flit?
>>
>
>
There are already some packages that are built using flit:
$ dnf repoquery --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=fedora-source --arch=src
--w
Hi Zbyszek,
On 13 August 2017 at 12:32, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 02:13:16PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 11.8.2017 08:25, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> > >Hello,
> > >
> > >My name is Elliott, but you may know me a
Hello,
My name is Elliott, but you may know me as QuLogic on IRC/FAS/GitHub/etc. I
am interested in Python 3 porting, scientific libraries, Jupyter, etc.,
some of which you can find in my coprs [1]. I am also an upstream developer
on libraries such as Matplotlib and Cartopy.
I have opened a few r
25 matches
Mail list logo