> but not quite.
Or [...] or even PACKAGENAME. The ellipsis is just too easy to miss.
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@
erate requirements on other Python packages(setuptools,
> Cython, etc.). If your package needs libmagic-devel to build, you
> still need to BuildRequire that one manually.
Yep, that was my question. :)
> Let's do that. I've put that on my TODO.
Cool, thanks!
--
Matthew Miller
es there.
> Maybe we'll be able to hide the binary package name once we have package
> generators (https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/329).
That would be amazing.
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
___
pytho
I'd like to suggest to the PyWaffle dev that if system Font Awesome is
found, the package uses that (whether installed by RPM or pip or whatever).
What's a good way to do that?
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
___
python-devel ma
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 12:14:29PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 17. 12. 21 17:58, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >The modern Python macros are ... kind of a lot to pick up as a casual
> >packager
> If you could share a more constructive feedback, I'd gladly iterate
> on the d
> My personal opinion is that packing Python libraries that are not required by
> packaged applications/tools brings very little benefit to the project. I
> suggest
> to use a Python virtual environment instead and install the libraries you
> need
> with pip.
In this case, it'd be really conv
> Hi! I'm using this https://github.com/gyli/PyWaffle for some visualizations
> for Fedora
> Project stats.
So, I've finally gotten around to packaging this up -- review request at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033481
it was a little annoying as I had to de-bundle fontawesome, b
e?) we could put in
place? Or is it just a coincidence that both packages made a similarly-named
mistake?
> I should step in as a provenpacakger it seems.
Thank you!
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
___
python-devel mailing l
Got a report on Ask Fedora(*) about an upgrade conflict, and, yep, these two
have a problem:
file
/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/test/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-310.opt-1.pyc
from install of python3-ansible-runner-2.0.0a1-3.fc35.noarch conflicts with
file from package python3-augeas-
Hi! I'm using this https://github.com/gyli/PyWaffle for some visualizations for
Fedora Project stats.
I'm kind of out of the loop on the state of the art of python packaging, and
wondered if some kind Python SIG person would like to take it on for me.
10 matches
Mail list logo
