Re: Loudly deprecating setup.py-based macros %py3_build %py3_install

2024-09-25 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hi, On Tue, 2024-09-24 at 13:03 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello Pythonistas, > > setuptools has deprecated executing setup.py (e.g. setup.py > build/install) long > time ago. It is only a matter of time when it won't be possible to > use > %py3_build, %py3_install, and %py3_build_wheel. > >

Re: Need help with build failure

2023-09-23 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 21:27 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 15:47 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 16:25 +0200, Lumír Balhar wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > > > Have you managed to fix the issue? The error is produce by the &

Re: Need help with build failure

2023-09-08 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 15:47 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 16:25 +0200, Lumír Balhar wrote: > > Hi. > > > > Have you managed to fix the issue? The error is produce by the > > configure > > script and the check is implemented there somewhere ar

Re: Need help with build failure

2023-09-08 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 16:25 +0200, Lumír Balhar wrote: > Hi. > > Have you managed to fix the issue? The error is produce by the > configure > script and the check is implemented there somewhere around line 4293 > but > I don't understand it well enough to tell you what causing it to > detect >

Re: Need help with build failure

2023-09-08 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 16:25 +0200, Lumír Balhar wrote: > Hi. > > Have you managed to fix the issue? The error is produce by the > configure > script and the check is implemented there somewhere around line 4293 > but > I don't understand it well enough to tell you what causing it to > detect >

Re: pathfix.py will be removed from Python 3.12

2023-01-14 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Thu, 2022-10-27 at 11:57 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 27. 10. 22 11:51, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > micropython  churchyard > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/micropython/pull-request/14 Hi, https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xpra/pull-request/1 breaks builds on epel9 from https:

Re: Orphaned python-chardet

2022-06-25 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sat, 2022-06-25 at 12:01 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > docker-compose docker-compose is not updated [1] since May 11, 2021, and we haven't new versions of 2.x. I think we should think in rules about packages which have gaps more than one year and what rules we should add to avoid these gaps, I s

why opencv Python package doesn't provide python3dist(opencv-python) ?

2022-02-17 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hi, Can someone help me ? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/opencv/blob/rawhide/f/opencv.spec have py_provides but https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054951 Thank you . -- Sérgio M. B. ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fe

where I have a %py_provides example ?

2021-10-10 Thread Sérgio Basto
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_provides_for_importable_modules the example doesn't provides %py_provides macro also I don't find mentions how replacing of %python_provide %py_provides Thank you -- Sérgio M. B. _

Re: pep8 was replaced by what ?

2021-07-15 Thread Sérgio Basto
Found it is pycodestyle On Thu, 2021-07-15 at 18:24 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pep8 was retired 2 years > ago > , have we any replacement ? for pep8 for example: > > pep8 --config pep8.conf fedora-review/java_guideli

pep8 was replaced by what ?

2021-07-15 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hi, https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pep8 was retired 2 years ago , have we any replacement ? for pep8 for example: pep8 --config pep8.conf fedora-review/java_guidelines.py Thank you, -- Sérgio M. B. ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-

Re: %{python3} no defined in epel-7-aarch64?

2021-01-04 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Mon, 2021-01-04 at 17:38 +, José Abílio Matos wrote: > I have used copr to build the first alpha release of lyx-2.4: > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jamatos/lyx-devel/build/1858028/ > > > For EPEL7 it build for x86_64 and it fails for aarch64, due to > %{python3} not being de

Re: [HEADS UP] Retiring python2 and introducing python27 later this week

2019-09-10 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 22:20 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > We are retiring python2 and introducing python27 later this week. Rawhide > only. > > As for now, nothing should break, except python2-debug will exist no more. > > Packages (build)requiring python2 or python2-devel should continue to work

I found 2 problems on remove python2-foo packages

2019-06-03 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hi, These removed python2 packages are breaking upgrade path 1- when you remove python2-foo , you should add to main package Obsoletes: python2-foo 2- IMHO you should just remove python2-foo only on latest branches, please don't forget epel7 case, so please add something like : %if 0%{?fedora

Re: packages provides Re: HEADS UP: python2-sphinx is going away on Monday (2019-03-11)

2019-03-09 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sat, 2019-03-09 at 08:14 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 8:20 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > :P I just found a weird bug : > > > > dnf repoquery --available --whatrequires python2-mlt > > flowblade-0

Re: Potemkin %check: Ran 0 tests in 0.000s

2019-03-04 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Tue, 2019-03-05 at 00:03 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following list of builds has "Ran 0 tests in 0.000s" in their > build log. > > It usually indicates a "Potemkin %check" [0] with python setup.py > test without > actual tests. > > [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potemkin_village I j

Re: Why are we shipping debug builds of pythons?

2018-08-04 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sat, 2018-08-04 at 22:25 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hi, > > an interesting discussion came up in the Python Maint team recently, > about not shipping python3-debug and python2-debug. > > On the Chesterton's fence principle [0], I'd would like to know why > are > we building and shipping th

Re: pyp2rpm version in fedora

2018-04-30 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Mon, 2018-04-30 at 05:29 -0400, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: > > - Original Message - > > From: "Martin Bukatovic" > > To: python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2018 9:18:16 PM > > Subject: pyp2rpm version in fedora > > > > Dear python devel list, > > > > I

Re: [DONE] Mass package change (python2- binary package renaming)

2018-04-05 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Thu, 2018-04-05 at 09:43 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 12:21:45AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Sun, 2017-08-20 at 20:49 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > On Sun, 2017-08-20 at 18:49 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > > wr

Re: [DONE] Mass package change (python2- binary package renaming)

2017-08-20 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sun, 2017-08-20 at 18:49 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 05:09:04PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Sun, 2017-08-20 at 14:46 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 05:16:54AM +0100, Sérgio Bas

Re: [DONE] Mass package change (python2- binary package renaming)

2017-08-20 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sun, 2017-08-20 at 14:46 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 05:16:54AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Sun, 2017-08-20 at 03:26 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I pushed

Re: [DONE] Mass package change (python2- binary package renaming)

2017-08-19 Thread Sérgio Basto
  python2-%{name} = %{version}-%{release} isn't it ? Thanks, [1] DEBUG util.py:439:  Error: nothing provides wxPython = 3.0.2.0-16.fc28 needed by wxPython-devel-3.0.2.0-16.fc28.ppc64 [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wxPython/blob/master/f/wxPython.spec --

Feature EasierPythonDebugging ?

2017-02-02 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hello ,  I'd like use this gdb python [1] , but can't put it work on Fedora 24, last problems mentioned are about Fedora 13 , can someone help me on pointing how I could use New_gdb_commands [2] ?  Thanks , [1]  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/EasierPythonDebugging#Current_state-of-the-art

Feature EasierPythonDebugging ?

2017-02-02 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hello ,  I'd like use this gdb python [1] , but can't put it work on Fedora 24, last problems mentioned are about Fedora 13 , can someone help me on pointing how I could use New_gdb_commands [2] ?  Thanks , [1]  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/EasierPythonDebugging#Current_state-of-the-art