On 30.11.20 10:54, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hence wrt backwards compatibility: pip might now refuse to uninstall the RPM
installed package, while previously it would have done so happily. That is an
improvement, but technically is not 100% backwards compatible behavior.
Oh, I can live with THAT :-
On 11/29/20 11:11 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Nov 29, 2020, at 5:00 PM, Felix Schwarz wrote:
Hey,
I just noticed that the new packaging macros create a .dist-info directory
instead of .egg-info.
Just to be sure: There is no incompatibility between these two, right? So
setuptools-based co
Am 29.11.20 um 23:11 schrieb Donald Stufft:
Unless there’s something fedora specific going on, that should be correct.
Upstream side, anytime pip installs from a Wheel it produces a dist-info
instead of a egg-info, so if there was some compatibility issue, it should have
been exposed awhile a
> On Nov 29, 2020, at 5:00 PM, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> I just noticed that the new packaging macros create a .dist-info directory
> instead of .egg-info.
>
> Just to be sure: There is no incompatibility between these two, right? So
> setuptools-based code can still retrieve all th
Hey,
I just noticed that the new packaging macros create a .dist-info directory
instead of .egg-info.
Just to be sure: There is no incompatibility between these two, right? So
setuptools-based code can still retrieve all the package metadata in .dist-info
directories?
(If so I can just updat
