- Original Message -
> On 27 February 2015 at 11:02, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 25, 2015 3:14 PM, "Nick Coghlan" wrote:
> >
> >> For those not following along with the FPC ticket, Toshio and Tomspur
> >> have a nice write-up of the options at
> >> https://etherpad.mozilla.org/2
Miro Hrončok пишет:
> On 27.2.2015 21:06, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Oh it seems only in the latest revision someone took the courtesy of
> translating it all to Russian.
That text is machine-translated and poorly at that.
--
Zart
___
python-devel mailing l
On 27.2.2015 21:06, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 26.2.2015 00:13, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> For those not following along with the FPC ticket, Toshio and Tomspur
>> have a nice write-up of the options at
>> https://etherpad.mozilla.org/2Uqk0ikCll
>>
>
> This thing is in Russian (while I guess it is actua
On 26.2.2015 00:13, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> For those not following along with the FPC ticket, Toshio and Tomspur
> have a nice write-up of the options at
> https://etherpad.mozilla.org/2Uqk0ikCll
>
This thing is in Russian (while I guess it is actually about Python and
I see some Fedora links in t
On 27 February 2015 at 11:02, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> On Feb 25, 2015 3:14 PM, "Nick Coghlan" wrote:
>
>> For those not following along with the FPC ticket, Toshio and Tomspur
>> have a nice write-up of the options at
>> https://etherpad.mozilla.org/2Uqk0ikCll
>>
>> I came back to this questio
On Feb 25, 2015 3:14 PM, "Nick Coghlan" wrote:
> For those not following along with the FPC ticket, Toshio and Tomspur
> have a nice write-up of the options at
> https://etherpad.mozilla.org/2Uqk0ikCll
>
> I came back to this question myself due to a couple of different
> ideas, discussed in http
Nick Coghlan schrieb am Do., 26. Feb. 2015 um
00:14 Uhr:
> On 5 February 2015 at 17:48, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > On 4 February 2015 at 21:01, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> >> - Original Message -
> >>> I don't really feel strongly about this, I agree that your solution
> has a
> >>> merit (an
On 5 February 2015 at 17:48, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 4 February 2015 at 21:01, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>>> I don't really feel strongly about this, I agree that your solution has a
>>> merit (and syspython *is* better than default_python :)). I think I'll open
>>>
On 4 February 2015 at 21:01, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> I don't really feel strongly about this, I agree that your solution has a
>> merit (and syspython *is* better than default_python :)). I think I'll open
>> an FPC ticket to ask FPC for their opinions on this and
- Original Message -
> I don't really feel strongly about this, I agree that your solution has a
> merit (and syspython *is* better than default_python :)). I think I'll open
> an FPC ticket to ask FPC for their opinions on this and then I'll start
> taking concrete steps [1] ;) to get this
- Original Message -
> > I will. Do you have any idea who I should talk to regarding EPEL? Is it
> > also Dennis?
> >
> Also dennis. Rel-eng is growing as a group so you could also put in
> a ticket/go to one of their weekly meetings but Dennis is probably still the
> one that knows the mo
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:59:01AM -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 06:26:26AM -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > >
> > > Current state:
> > > - Up until F21, maintainers were encouraged to build applications with
> > > Python 2, but weren't d
- Original Message -
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 06:26:26AM -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> >
> > Current state:
> > - Up until F21, maintainers were encouraged to build applications with
> > Python 2, but weren't discouraged from building with Python 3.
>
> Note -- this isn't quite right.
- Original Message -
> On 28 January 2015 at 03:32, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:50:07PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> >> What if, instead, we were able to add a new macro that let folks
> >> *explicitly* opt in to running in the "system Python", but then define
> >
On 28 January 2015 at 03:32, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:50:07PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> What if, instead, we were able to add a new macro that let folks
>> *explicitly* opt in to running in the "system Python", but then define
>> the recommended spec file usage such
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:50:07PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> >
> > %if 0%{?fedora}
> > %global default_python python3
> > %else
> > %global default_python python
> > %endif
>
> I'm wary of this proposed solution mostly due to the fact that in the
> middle of last year, the Beaker team had to go
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 06:26:26AM -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>
> Current state:
> - Up until F21, maintainers were encouraged to build applications with Python
> 2, but weren't discouraged from building with Python 3.
Note -- this isn't quite right. If an application could run with either
p
- Original Message -
> On 27 January 2015 at 21:26, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > Hey all,
> > I just wanted to ask for some thoughts on a "problem" (or rather a
> > "hardship") that is starting to show with the Python 3 transition in
> > Fedora.
> > I've been contacted by two maintainers of
On 27 January 2015 at 21:26, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> Hey all,
> I just wanted to ask for some thoughts on a "problem" (or rather a
> "hardship") that is starting to show with the Python 3 transition in Fedora.
> I've been contacted by two maintainers of "applications" in Fedora for advice
> and
Hey all,
I just wanted to ask for some thoughts on a "problem" (or rather a "hardship")
that is starting to show with the Python 3 transition in Fedora.
I've been contacted by two maintainers of "applications" in Fedora for advice
and have been thinking for some time how to solve this:
Note: by
20 matches
Mail list logo
