> "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
ZJ> This guidelines are just too vague, and I think this is the source
ZJ> of many disagreements over naming.
Well, there is
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Libraries_and_Applications
which I don't think is particularly vague.
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:46:42AM +0200, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On 08/10/2017 02:49 AM, Ben Rosser wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >This is following up on a brief conversation I was part of in IRC
> >(#fedora-devel) earlier:
> >
> >I've never been quite sure how to name packages written in Python when
> >the
On 08/10/2017 02:49 AM, Ben Rosser wrote:
Hi,
This is following up on a brief conversation I was part of in IRC
(#fedora-devel) earlier:
I've never been quite sure how to name packages written in Python when
they are just applications. Many "applications" written in Python
still install themsel
On 10 August 2017 at 10:49, Ben Rosser wrote:
> As a counter-proposal I would suggest that, as we currently do, we
> require the python3-prefix to be provided by the package, but
> explicitly leave it to the packager+reviewer's discretion whether or
> not the prefix must be part of the real name,
Hi,
This is following up on a brief conversation I was part of in IRC
(#fedora-devel) earlier:
I've never been quite sure how to name packages written in Python when
they are just applications. Many "applications" written in Python
still install themselves using distutils or setuptools, and so in
