Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.10 (and what to do)

2021-06-15 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 08. 06. 21 15:58, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: Chances are, you already got an automated F35FailsToInstall bugzilla from Miro, that your package fails to install. It would be really helpful if you could find the missing dependency and mark the bugzilla for your package dependingon the bugzilla for

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.10 (and what to do)

2021-06-08 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 08. 06. 21 21:52, Jos de Kloe wrote: I am seeing this error when trying to build locally using mock: Error:  Problem: package python3-xarray-0.17.0-1.fc35.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.9, but none of the providers can be installed   - package python3-devel-3.10.0~b2-3.fc35.x86_64

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.10 (and what to do)

2021-06-08 Thread Jos de Kloe
I am seeing this error when trying to build locally using mock: Error: Problem: package python3-xarray-0.17.0-1.fc35.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.9, but none of the providers can be installed - package python3-devel-3.10.0~b2-3.fc35.x86_64 conflicts with python3 < 3.10.0~b2-3.fc35

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.10 (and what to do)

2021-06-08 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 08. 06. 21 19:19, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: I need help for PETSC, please. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959088 I took a look and reported https://bugs.python.org/issue44351 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.10 (and what to do)

2021-06-08 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
On 6/8/21 3:58 PM, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: Hello. As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.10side tagto Rawhide, despite several builds not succeeding.We always aim for some compromise between having the side tag open for too long and having too many failures.