Re: Current plan: Build python3, python3-libs etc. from python39 SRPM on F33+

2020-04-06 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 06. 04. 20 13:56, Neal Gompa wrote: As long as there's a flag for doing fully versioned not-flat packages, I think I'd be good with this. That is: python3Y-* packages. --without flatpackage -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___

Re: Current plan: Build python3, python3-libs etc. from python39 SRPM on F33+

2020-04-06 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 8:40 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello Pythonistas. > > (I've CC'ed the devel list for further exposure. But let's discuss this on > python-devel list please to avoid noise.) > > > We would like ro rename the "python3" component (SRPM) to "python39" to make > maintaining v

Re: Current plan: Build python3, python3-libs etc. from python39 SRPM on F33+

2020-04-06 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 24. 03. 20 13:40, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello Pythonistas. (I've CC'ed the devel list for further exposure. But let's discuss this on python-devel list please to avoid noise.) We  would like ro rename the "python3" component (SRPM) to "python39" to  make maintaining various Python versions

Re: Current plan: Build python3, python3-libs etc. from python39 SRPM on F33+

2020-03-24 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 24. 03. 20 17:12, José Abílio Matos wrote: What about bugzilla? Will it follow the renaming? That means that we need to know the python version (not difficult I admit) to know the component where to submit the bug report. We will still own the python3 component and triage the bugs as usual.

Re: Current plan: Build python3, python3-libs etc. from python39 SRPM on F33+

2020-03-24 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Tuesday, 24 March 2020 16.38.38 WET Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > The binary path only cares about binary package names, so it is unaffected > by this change. My concern here is not about the path of binaries. The issue is about the upgrade path. But after looking into the pull request

Re: Current plan: Build python3, python3-libs etc. from python39 SRPM on F33+

2020-03-24 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 04:12:29PM +, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Tuesday, 24 March 2020 12.40.24 WET Miro Hrončok wrote: > > We would like ro rename the "python3" component (SRPM) to "python39" to > > make maintaining various Python versions in various Fedora versions > > easier. The name

Re: Current plan: Build python3, python3-libs etc. from python39 SRPM on F33+

2020-03-24 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Tuesday, 24 March 2020 12.40.24 WET Miro Hrončok wrote: > We would like ro rename the "python3" component (SRPM) to "python39" to > make maintaining various Python versions in various Fedora versions > easier. The names of binary RPMs would be unchanged; you still do `dnf > install python3`.

Re: Current plan: Build python3, python3-libs etc. from python39 SRPM on F33+

2020-03-24 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 01:40:24PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello Pythonistas. > > (I've CC'ed the devel list for further exposure. But let's discuss > this on python-devel list please to avoid noise.) > > > We would like ro rename the "python3" component (SRPM) to > "python39" to make mai