On 21 August 2017 at 19:53, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On 08/18/2017 12:06 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> I couldn't get Pagure's webhooks to work properly (see
>> https://pagure.io/pagure/issue/2522), so revising the revised plan:
>> could someone with the appropriate access create me a fedora-python
>>
On 08/18/2017 12:06 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 15 August 2017 at 19:44, Nick Coghlan wrote:
So I decided to set up a build on ReadTheDocs instead, and that looks
to have just worked, including the logo rendering:
https://fedora-python.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
I couldn't get Pagure's webhooks
On 15 August 2017 at 19:44, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> So I decided to set up a build on ReadTheDocs instead, and that looks
> to have just worked, including the logo rendering:
> https://fedora-python.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
I couldn't get Pagure's webhooks to work properly (see
https://pagure.io/p
On 11 August 2017 at 17:34, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> The relocated "default Python module" proposal is at
> https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-python.fedora-python/default-python-module.html
>
> I'm not super fond of that auto-generated URL, nor do I like the
> client-driven update process for pushing ch
On 2 August 2017 at 21:34, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> While working on
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ncoghlan/Default_python_module, I
> started getting annoyed at the lack of decent review and commenting
> features in MediaWiki, so prompted by
> https://docs.pagure.org/modularity/ I went ahead
While working on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ncoghlan/Default_python_module, I
started getting annoyed at the lack of decent review and commenting
features in MediaWiki, so prompted by
https://docs.pagure.org/modularity/ I went ahead and started a
fedora-python repo at https://pagure.io/fed
