On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 05:49:18PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> I don't have a lot of concrete feedback to offer, since I agree with
> your description of the problem, and think your proposed tweaks would
> be a good way of improving things.
Thanks for checking my proposal.
> As an additional bi
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 03:52:06AM -0500, Robert Kuska wrote:
> Hi Martin, I like your ideas, the best way to move
> this forward is to open a ticket for fpc[0].
Ah, thanks for pointing this out. The ticket is here:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/598
--
Martin Bukatovic
___
- Original Message -
> From: "Martin Bukatovic"
> To: python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2016 2:13:59 AM
> Subject: visibility of pyp2rpm tool
>
> Dear fedora-python-devel,
>
> I noticed a problem with pyp2rpm tool: it
On 9 February 2016 at 11:13, Martin Bukatovic
wrote:
> Dear fedora-python-devel,
>
> I noticed a problem with pyp2rpm tool: it's a great tool, but it's
> hardly visible and new python packager can easily miss it. The fact that
> both Packaging:Python and SIGs/Python wikipages doesn't properly ment
Dear fedora-python-devel,
I noticed a problem with pyp2rpm tool: it's a great tool, but it's
hardly visible and new python packager can easily miss it. The fact that
both Packaging:Python and SIGs/Python wikipages doesn't properly mention
it doesn't really help as well. No fried of mine who recent
