Re: [pygtk] Turning the PyGTK+ brand into something more than it currently is

2012-11-17 Thread Simon Feltman
Hi Giuseppe, On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Giuseppe Penone wrote: > > I read that there's no need of reference because gtk3 reference is enough, > well I'm a gtk3 and gtkmm3 developer over a pygtk developer (my most used > app is www.giuspen.com/cherrytree) but still I miss pygtk reference whe

Re: [pygtk] Turning the PyGTK+ brand into something more than it currently is

2012-11-17 Thread John Stowers
> > I think we could do a lot more with the PyGTK+ name and > http://www.pygtk.org/ to promote gobject-introspection as our new, exciting > solution. If nothing else, it rolls off the tongue much easier. Say it a few > times. > > Anybody have any other ideas here? > I think the stupidest mistake i

Re: [pygtk] Turning the PyGTK+ brand into something more than it currently is

2012-11-17 Thread Mark Summerfield
Hi Jasper, On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:25:32 -0500 "Jasper St. Pierre" wrote: > I like Python. I help new people out in Python IRC channels, on forums, > and I recommend Python to friends and family who say they want to learn > programming. > > At some point, the time comes when they want to start do