Excellent work, and thanks a lot.
It is reassuring to see someone caring about this again!
Regards,
John
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Simon Feltman wrote:
> There is now a patch set [1] which includes lazy doc string evaluation
> along with the removal of wrapped invoke/info objects. Wi
Hi Sebastian,
Thanks for your work on the tutorial. I regularly refer people to it.
However I wonder if this could go on gnome.org?
I already feel that Javascript was chosen instead of python in
the latest GNOME .
Perhaps having the docs on gnome.org might go some way to remedy this.
John
On
>
> I think we could do a lot more with the PyGTK+ name and
> http://www.pygtk.org/ to promote gobject-introspection as our new, exciting
> solution. If nothing else, it rolls off the tongue much easier. Say it a few
> times.
>
> Anybody have any other ideas here?
>
I think the stupidest mistake i
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Micah Carrick wrote:
> I wrote a Python port[1] of the Bloatpad example application from the
> GtkApplication docs this weekend
Thanks for this! It was helpful when I was having a play today.
Unfortunately I was stuck at
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id
>
> How am I supposed to proceed here?
You could fake it
https://github.com/luv/gnome-tweak-tool/commit/c559171c385513cb72d2c3d998494077de732c1e
John
___
python-hackers-list mailing list
python-hackers-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listi
Hi all,
Does anyone have any code demonstrating how to use the new
GtkApplication, GMenu and other new stuff from pygobject?
Similar to the gtk3-demo application and bloatpad examples in the gtk
tree.
Thanks,
John
___
python-hackers-list mailing list
