Re: Improving PyGObject documentation

2013-02-14 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 10:36 +0100, Jonathan Ballet wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 08:55:32AM -0500, Sebastian Pölsterl wrote: > > Dear Jonathan, > > I don't see it as an API reference manual, because that would mean that > > one has to maintain that manually and update it if the C

Re: Improving PyGObject documentation

2013-02-14 Thread Sebastian Pölsterl
Hi John, I don't have anything against putting it gnome.org, the source is available in github, so everyone could use it on his or her server. What's nice about github is that it comes with a commit hook which automatically updates readthedocs.org which is very nice. Best regards, Sebastian Am

Re: Improving PyGObject documentation

2013-02-14 Thread Sebastian Pölsterl
Am 14.02.2013 04:44, schrieb Jonathan Ballet: > Hi Sebastian, > >> I'll probably submit some updates then. What would be the process to >> submit things? (where, how?) > > Oh, I didn't see it was on Github. Pull requests should be OK? > > Jonathan > Hi Jonathan, yes, sending a pull request is

Re: Improving PyGObject documentation

2013-02-14 Thread John Stowers
Hi Sebastian, Thanks for your work on the tutorial. I regularly refer people to it. However I wonder if this could go on gnome.org? I already feel that Javascript was chosen instead of python in the latest GNOME . Perhaps having the docs on gnome.org might go some way to remedy this. John On

Re: Improving PyGObject documentation

2013-02-14 Thread Jonathan Ballet
Hi Sebastian, > I'll probably submit some updates then. What would be the process to > submit things? (where, how?) Oh, I didn't see it was on Github. Pull requests should be OK? Jonathan ___ python-hackers-list mailing list python-hackers-list@gnome.

Re: Improving PyGObject documentation

2013-02-14 Thread Jonathan Ballet
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 06:15:55PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On 10 February 2013 12:25, Jonathan Ballet wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm currently working on an application which uses PyGObject and Gtk 3. > > I used once or twice the informations provided in > > http://python-gtk-3-tutorial.**read

Re: Improving PyGObject documentation

2013-02-14 Thread Jonathan Ballet
Hi Sebastian, On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 08:55:32AM -0500, Sebastian Pölsterl wrote: > Dear Jonathan, > > I don't see it as an API reference manual, because that would mean that > one has to maintain that manually and update it if the C reference > changes. Ultimately, this will lead to the python r

Re: Improving PyGObject documentation

2013-02-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On 10 February 2013 12:25, Jonathan Ballet wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently working on an application which uses PyGObject and Gtk 3. > I used once or twice the informations provided in > http://python-gtk-3-tutorial.**readthedocs.org/but > I mostly r

Re: Improving PyGObject documentation

2013-02-11 Thread Sebastian Pölsterl
Dear Jonathan, I don't see it as an API reference manual, because that would mean that one has to maintain that manually and update it if the C reference changes. Ultimately, this will lead to the python reference being behind the C reference all the time. My main purpose was indeed to write a tu