On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 7 February 2017 at 14:29, Steve Dower wrote:
>> You can leave python.exe out of your distribution to avoid it showing up on
>> PATH, or if your stub explicitly LoadLibrary's vcruntime140.dll and then
>> python36.dll you should be able to put
Let the dissection of the Twitter-based biases and bubbles begin. :)
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:15 AM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I created the following poll on Twitter with a duration of 7 days:
> """
> Is it Python 3 yet?
> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2017-January/01
On 2/7/17, Mike Miller wrote:
> Hmm, agreed. BTW, I think the current download page is *way* too
> complicated
> for new comers.
>
> There should be a giant button for the latest 3.x/64 (platform sniffed),
> and below it a more subtle button for the "LTS" 2.X/32.
I am afraid that "LTS" could con
On Sat, Feb 4, 2017, at 10:15, Steve Dower wrote:
> These days, the subset of C99 supported by MSVC is "most" of it, so feel
> free to start off by assuming the best, at least for new features (the
> version we use for 2.7 obviously is not improving).
The subset of the C *library*, anyway, since i
Agree with all of this. That's state of the art for many projects.
On 07.02.2017 07:35, Mike Miller wrote:
Hmm, agreed. BTW, I think the current download page is *way* too
complicated for new comers.
There should be a giant button for the latest 3.x/64 (platform sniffed),
and below it a more
On 7 February 2017 at 14:29, Steve Dower wrote:
> You can leave python.exe out of your distribution to avoid it showing up on
> PATH, or if your stub explicitly LoadLibrary's vcruntime140.dll and then
> python36.dll you should be able to put them wherever you like.
Understood, but I may need pyth
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017, at 02:29 PM, Steve Dower wrote:
> I think what we really want is a self-extractor that "installs" into
> the user's AppData directory without prompting for admin.
There's a PR in the works for Pynsist that will add a non-admin per-user
install into AppData:
https://github.co
You can leave python.exe out of your distribution to avoid it showing up on
PATH, or if your stub explicitly LoadLibrary's vcruntime140.dll and then
python36.dll you should be able to put them wherever you like.
I think what we really want is a self-extractor that "installs" into the user's
App
On 7 February 2017 at 12:33, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017, at 11:26 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>> I'm working on
>> a project to bundle a working zipapp with the embedded distribution to
>> make a standalone exe - would having something like that make any
>> difference in your environme
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017, at 11:26 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> I'm working on
> a project to bundle a working zipapp with the embedded distribution to
> make a standalone exe - would having something like that make any
> difference in your environment?
I'd be interested in this, and whether there's any po
Hi,
I created the following poll on Twitter with a duration of 7 days:
"""
Is it Python 3 yet?
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2017-January/01.html
I proposed to hide Python 2 by default from the http://python.org download page.
( ) It's Python 3 O'Clock!
( ) Have some legacy p
11 matches
Mail list logo
