Nick Coghlan wrote:
but at the cost of
changing the nature of the workload in a given thread, and hence
messing with the working set of objects it has active.
Does the working set of an individual thread matter to anything?
Or even an individual process? As far as the virtual memory
system is c
This is a bad idea in the generator itself, as commented earlier by others
here.
>From a cross implementation perspective, in Jython, different threads can
call next on a non running generator, *so long as they coordinate with each
other external to any use of this generator*, and this works fine.
