On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 08:03:32PM +0200, Jason H wrote:
> But really, I've learned a few things along the way. Though nothing to
> convince me that I'm wrong or it's a bad idea. It's just not liked by
> the greybeards, which I can appreciate. "here's some new punk kid, get
> off my lawn!"
On 09/15/2017 11:03 AM, Jason H wrote:
From: "Steven D'Aprano"
>> Um... what's in it for *us*? What benefit do we get?
>
How that question is answered, depends on who is 'us'? If you're a bunch of
> python purist greybeards, then conceivably nothing.
How about refugees
On 9/15/17 2:03 PM, Jason H wrote:
It's just not liked by the greybeards, which I can appreciate. "here's some new punk
kid, get off my lawn!" type of mentality. Dunning-Kruger, etc.
I'm not sure if you meant this tongue-in-cheek or not. The main problem
with your proposal is that it would
> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 at 12:24 PM
> From: "Steven D'Aprano"
> To: python-ideas@python.org
> Subject: Re: [Python-ideas] Make map() better
>
> Jason,
>
> I'm sorry if you feel that everyone is piling on you to poo-poo your
> ideas, but we've heard it all
Jason,
I'm sorry if you feel that everyone is piling on you to poo-poo your
ideas, but we've heard it all before. To you it might seem like
"peaceful coexistence", but we already have peaceful coexistence. Python
exists, and Javascript exists (to say nothing of thousands of other
languages,
On Sep 15, 2017 7:23 AM, "Jason H" wrote:
Another pain point is python uses [].append() and JS uses [].join() Having
a wrapper for append would be helpful.
There should be one, and only one, obvious way to do it.
And for that matter, why isn't append/extend a global? I can add
> And for that matter, why isn't append/extend a global? I can add things
to lots of different collections. lists, sets, strings...
No, append is relevant when the collection is ordered. You update
dictionnaries, you make unions of sets, and you append lists to another
ones.
These operations are
I'm going to respond to a few replies with this one.
> > Because join apply on a string, and strings are defined by the str class,
> > not by a specific protocol (unlike iterables).
>
> Join actually used to only be available as a function (string.join in
> Python 2.x). However, nobody could
Hi Alexandre,
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:58:43PM -0700, alexandre.gal...@gmail.com wrote:
> But my idea is only to define basical metrics, useful to evaluate quality
> code, and related to PEPs if existing. I precise i'd like to propose
> informational PEP only. I'm not considering that my
On 9/15/2017 1:58 AM,
alexandre.gal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your return, and link. I knew PyCQA but not the others.
It seems i didn't success to precise my idea correctly. I'm 100% OK with
you that this is not language role to indicate precisely which tools to
use.
But my idea
10 matches
Mail list logo